Sad. Though High court direction given to hear within local jurisdiction, the Aravakurichi district munsif cum Judicial Magistrate dismissed a case stating the case is of civil nature and pending with high court without considering any facts. Petitioner has filed valid 15documents related to Registrar office, Revenue department and even previous court orders. The respondent didn't and couldn't file even a single document but the munsif dismissed the case on mere blandisment of the respondent counsel. If any good soul Justice or magistrate hears or analyses the case they will understand the way the munsif has handled the case. Now again another case lodged as civil on grounds of EP. Now also 15documents submitted. Respondent couldn't submit any documents and bringing in third party witnesses with cooked up stories and the Aravakurichi court is allowing hearing and cross examining them. Will the witness created by respondent enough and valid more than documents and earlier court orders. It is a contempt of court and they are trying to fool the court and waste it's precious timings. With their arguments they are proving and admitting contempt of court boldly but with diverting and dragging tactics adopted creating an environment of no contempt of court is done. Can a court allow respondent to bring all type of third party witness and record their statement, all confirming criminal trespass as genuine and legitimate without any knowledge of the court orders. Why is our legal mechanism so weak and manipulated.

Paisa paisa paisa