We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Is it true?
If yes, what is the exact nature of their shortcoming? Can it be addressed?
If no, how does one go about getting the Administrator changed for the 2024 Jessup?
After the moot was over, a certain finalist team was being dissed by each opponent they had faced wondering how they beat them and got to the finals. That team's performance in the finals was also very average with no clarity of law.
When we got our score sheet, I checked the judges in that surprising round of ours, and one of them was a professor from the same college that the finalist team was from, and another was an alumni.
The whole situation seemed like a sham at that point.