We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
The obvious answer staring you all in the face is paddy. He’s gonna take over once raj is okay to step away. Not a scholar at all - but then again it’s more business than university.
So I think Raj will be phased out into a mentorship role. As for Dipika, she will be sidelined because her feminist focus is falling out of favour with the management: it’s ideologically inconvenient and doesn’t fetch jobs either. She does have s PhD as week. Re Sreejith, I seem him heading for VCship or Deanship somewhere else.
- Sudhir Krishnaswamy
- Nigam Nuggehali
- Arun Thiruvengadam
- Pritam Baruah
- Dipika Jain
I just hope the race for a successor does result in an internal power struggle within the faculty.
You might not agree with why he went down the boat road - but he faces a do or die situation in that pandemic year , his was the only institution to at would be financially impacted by not admitting students , and the clay consortium had postponed clat some three to four times. It’s ridiculous. If he hadn’t gone his own way- those guys don’t care they wouldn’t have done clat that year at all.
I honestly think nls should just have it’s own exam and pull out of clat - it’s a silly stupid exam that’s badly done.
He lost in the SC on procedure- so okay they refunded the money- not all of it but some of it. The money they didn’t refund - went to paying examiners and contractors and test centres. Who do you propose should pay them ? Should they starve because of a Supreme Court order ? If you want Sudhir to pay them personally for something he did as head of an institution - which was in the best interest of the institution - I’d have to think you just want him to suffer because you’ve developed some parasocial relationship.
The logic for the virtual convo was the same thing- stuff was paid out for a real convocation - and the institution needed the money to survive. Y’all don’t realise how fragile nls’s finances were when he took over. And he works for the university - not for you.
If you’re gonna accuse him of corruption - which LI wouldn’t allow if they had any integrity, they only allow these allegations against one person. Then the onus is on YOU to prove that he saw one red cent of any of that money.
Remember Raj is not just a Vice Chancellor. He is the founder of the University (of course Mr. Jindal paid the money but the idea to execution, all done meticulously by Raj.
Nobody mentioned above can even remotely match the personality, passion or hardwork of Prof. Raj Kumar.
Raj is absolutely young and full of energy. Not even hit 50. Next 10 years he must remain JGU VC.
I'm not sure if Aman Shah is still in Jindal but he might be a candidate too
Mos importantly of all, Dipika is an entrenched part of the establishment since inception. No has has taught at JGLS for longer than she has. She joined as founding faculty.
So she is my bet for being the next VC.
Marketing- money
Hostels- money
Unlimited students- money
Educational institution- factory - money
Foreign ties- marketing- money
No focus on quality of education?
Nothing on making it a respectable institution?
This is also the difference with Ashoka. The Chancellor at Ashoka is a serious academic, whereas the Chancellor at Jindal is Naveen Jindal. Also, Ashoka funders don't interfere and demand profits on their investments. They are proper philanthropists.
a) Expanding student numbers like crazy, taking many mediocre students and putting pressure on recruitments.
b) Expanding faculty because of that, many of whom are not great.
c) Setting up loss-making schools one after the other. Needlessly competing with Ashoka, JNU, TISS and various B-schools, policy schools, journalism schools and architecture schools, instead of just focusing on competing with NLUs.
d) As a result of c, making JGLS (the only profit-making school) fund the costs of the same.
Raj has been VC since 2009: 14 years is a long time. Maybe it's time for a change? Shouldn't all VCs have a shelf life? How long does he intend to go on for? 20 years?
There are plenty of things Raj can do if he leaves. For example, the Congress can make him education minister in Tamil Nadu. He can implement lots of good ideas there. Or he can join Jio University and do even bigger things there, using Mukesh Ambani's coffers.
P.S. This is for JGLS students and alumni only. Requesting others not to butt in, troll or fake being a JGLS student/alum.