The obvious question to ask is whether this also applies to Ashoka's equally elite neighbour in Sonipat: JGLS. However, on the contrary, what's wrong in creating a finishing school for rich students? In many ways, won't they be prepared better when they join top law firms in India and abroad and advise rich clients? Also, are teachers expected to be jholawala-carrying social activists? What's wrong if they have a comfortable job like corporate people?
1. You assume that Jindal is providing better education to those students, preparing them better to pursue such careers, compared to the public universities like NLUs. The last decade has seen that it is not.
2. There is nothing wrong in earning more money while teaching. If that means making certain compromises about towing the admin line or accepting student-teacher relationship as a customer-service provider one, then that's a choice that every eligible teacher is free to make.
https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/ashokan-edicts-intellectual-freedom-and-the-private-university/cid/1963425
2. There is nothing wrong in earning more money while teaching. If that means making certain compromises about towing the admin line or accepting student-teacher relationship as a customer-service provider one, then that's a choice that every eligible teacher is free to make.