We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
See which firm did the airport deal. It's a simple Google search.
( PS - new to Comp.)
If there are zero overlaps, why should an airport deal not be filed under green channel?
Like is there anything more we should focus on based on the competition team of the following firms:
Trilegal
AZB
Thanks
2. Amendments to the competition act, draft regulations that have been published this year
3. GCR reports on Indian competition law
Good luck!
It was a legit PE Fund with no airport /airline investment investing in an airport.
Not providing specific details but building on to the illustration - if you will question ▮▮▮ that sun cannot be orange. ▮▮▮ won't say anything to you at that time but ▮▮▮ will carry it in her heart and make your life miserable.
If she says that the sun is not sun but orange. You should say, "yes it is.. should I pluck it? Would you like to eat?"