We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Not evicting all dogs from their habitats
Please note that treating dogs cruelly contributes to them becoming aggressive to other human beings
Do not do it
If there are aggressive dogs - inform an animal shelter to pick them up - they have specialised care and treatment for these aggressive dogs. Many of them just have hormonal issues and get better with treatment.
we are not against feeding animals, but rather do it in a systematic way so that it benefits the animals and also train them well so they don't bite others
and i am not a nlu student frankly idk what it means
simply put, make dogs not bite humans and not defecate in wrong places so that it doesnot cause health issues to other living beings
if thats not possible then only way is to separate humans and dogs
I also saw someone talking about the "people who complain about dogs also did this" - its nice to have context about someone while dealing with personal matters, but in a general topic discussion like this, objectively looking at these arguments based on their merit alone in an unbiased way is better.I am someone who has been afraid of dogs from the beginning of my childhood.I find it hard to trust a dog due to the following reasons:
He doesn't understand certain things about our life for example, in roads, they start to chase vehicles causing accidents and lives, also biting people whom he thinks is dangerous due to the behaviour of other human beings.
When I am going to mess and getting food from there to hostel(i am from a diff college), he actively blocks the way and asks for the food with me not allowing me to go and not understanding that I already don,t have enough money for me to eat how could I afford for him?
To all those people who say things like "just one dog did doesn't mean dogs are bad"- lemme just twist it back "just because one human did not all humans bad" - then why did the dogs bite/chase?
its simple - both of these cases the subjects don't want to risk trying to expose themselves
The same is with me - a dog which has sharp teeth and claws could very easily damage me
It doesn't mean it will, but there is clearly potential for it to do so
Let's just say they start allowing using guns to the public without a license, what happens then? people 'who are not trained' will get access to a dangerous power [Power Corrupts]
In case of dogs, I am not asking to kill/evacuate the dogs - all I want is to be safe
Just make sure the dogs dont cause harm to other fellow beings or defecate in wrong places - maybe train them - all those animal activism organisations provide food to them
Let's say a person shoots some person, the one will be in jail after a few days
but what about dogs?will they put in jail? - in my opinion they shouldn't be put in jail
dogs don't even know that a law exists so they are almost like a kid so he should be given freedom to that extent
Please be aware I spend a lot of time and effort to do my stuff and a dog just coming easily and damaging all of these is unacceptable
I AM HAPPY TO HEAR OPINIONS ABOUT THIS FROM OTHER PEOPLE - PLEASE GIVE YOUR OPINION SO THAT I COULD KNOW THAT I AM WRONG AND CORRECT IT.
One outcome of this incident will be that there will be increased visibility about the issue which is sadly never provided or shouted down when the victims are poor kids. Meanwhile, the judiciary who stay cocooned in their privileged life and spaces, keep furthering this menace. An immediate and humane solution to this menace is needed. You cannot keep compounding the misery of other living beings. Going to carry around a stick for safety purposes henceforth
Bar and Bench Link: https://www.barandbench.com/news/orissa-high-court-orders-relocation-stray-dogs-nlu-odisha-campus-student-cerebral-palsy-attacked
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/climate-and-people/indias-stray-dog-days-finally/
One particular dog that arrived on campus a few days later began chasing people. Things were still manageable; it was just one dog, and people tried to avoid it. Last semester, there were puppies, and for the most part, they were harmless. This semester, however, the dogs have grown up and started acting aggressively. It's become challenging for people to walk around campus because you never know when you might be chased by a group of dogs. Many people have been bitten, and many more have had close encounters. The issue of dogs defecating and urinating in the academic block and hostels is a major problem, but it's just one of the issues. The safety of students is at risk, and therefore, we hope that something will be done about the dogs.
Until now, nobody wanted the dogs to be removed because they didn't pose any problems. However, with each passing day, new problems are arising. People are actually getting bitten, and it's not just a one-time incident. Calling those people wishing to have a bare minimum livable life on campus "inhumane" is just not done.
Also do remember there is always a bigger fish if you think that people canโt outpower you.
Unless you don't, relocating them periodically seems like a pretty good plan
Also co living and all is fine but I donโt appreciate dogs scourging my hostel floors dustbin at any random hour of the day/night. And this beautiful thing happens when I live on the second floor. Canโt imagine what the scene is like at lower floors.
https://factly.in/there-is-no-supreme-court-order-which-makes-the-person-feeding-stray-dogs-liable-for-its-bites/
Lol.
READ IT BEFORE COMMENTING
If you want to remove dogs, go ahead and do it but face the legal consequences because obviously it's illegal and there will be consequences :)
These are some of the people raising concerns of hygiene and safety regarding dogs on college.
We are here to study and we share a common space with the dogs who were born here. The entitlement of people pushing to remove the dogs does not surprise me but all their concerns would be taken seriously if they actually care about safety and hygiene, not just when it is an inconvenience for them. No one is asking these people to take money out of their pockets and feed dogs, they can very well use it for whatever they please, just don't dictate how we should use our money. And yes, we are not going to adopt every other dog and bring them home, this campus is their home, they belong here,and deserve to be here perhaps even more than you do. You are welcome to dictate us and ask us to adopt dogs, thank you, might consider it, might not, come to a discussion with practical and reasonable solutions.
https://twitter.com/ACKComics/status/856754507593601025
Most of these animal lovers are rich brats who grew up with pets and have enough money to keep a pack of biscuits every time they are outside of their room. I don't want to get bitten by them, I don't want to be licked by them, it makes me feel unclean, and I don't want to spend money on their upkeep no matter how small the amount may seem to you.
I just want to feel safe when I'm roaming around the campus for which I paid a pretty heavy fee.
And we will continue feeding, and we reiterate, no feeder is going to assume responsibility for the living expenses or medical expenses for anyone injured by the dogs.
The solution to relocate them is embarrassingly ineffective and unoriginal and moreover, illegal. The dogs are aggressive because they are either in heat or hungry and regularly feeding them, neutering them and vaccinating them is the only viable long term solution and this responsibility falls upon the administration of a college not on animal rights activists.
The people wanting to get them relocated are just trying to illegally remove dogs and resort to a rather ineffective strategy. All the best to that.
It's my moral and legal right and I will continue to do so and you can't stop the feeders because you have no basis to do so. My college has a bunch of entitled people I owe absolutely nothing to. No feeder is responsible for any of the conduct of dogs and you are free to establish otherwise if you can :)
and somehow that is my fault, wow, way to victim blame
Gandhi had said that you can judge the greatness of a civilisation by the way it treats its animals. Sorry to say, but by this metric NLUJ students (and other NLU dog-hating students) are brutes.
I think we should ask a simple question to these activists: if you love the dogs so much, why don't you adopt them and keep them in your home?
IMO start making videos of the people who feed these dogs, generally don't want dogs gone from campus and hold them liable (in accordance with the court order) in case anyone gets bitten, as many many already have.......