We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
When an offer is made, these top rankholders will have multiple offers, and they'll undoubtedly go for a T1 firm, and these offers would be wasted. I can't decide if it is by design or sheer lack of perspective?
As a T2/T3 firm, of you intend to hire from a T1 NLU, at least try to go beyond the top rank holders and analyse the CV of others who might be equally deserving and more likely to accept instead of wasting offers. Or is it deliberate, where you actually have close to no vacancies and you're well aware that these will be rejected but you do this just to perhaps save face?