We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
https://cnlu.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Regulations-For-Appointment-Of-Teaching-and-Non-Teaching-Staff-and-Their-Service-Conditions.pdf
Further, you can find it in the about section of
website.
This appointment is good for CNLU, a step down for FM after NALSAR, but FM is no institution-builder. He's not going to make CNLU great. NALSAR declined in his time and NLUD overtook it. Bajpai didn't make RGNUL great and SKD didn't do anything much for NLUO. All of them rode on the coat tails of their predecessors at their tier-1 NLUs. So, no real difference will be seen in the larger scheme, but students of CNLU might have it a little better now. Big loss for NLUJ though, FM could've helped that place cope with their domicile quota now.