We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Around 100 outsider candidates who were qualified Prelims, Gujarati proficiency test, and mains last year couldn't qualify their Gujarati proficiency test this time .
Around 2 writ petitions are pending in Apex court against minimum criteria of 20 marks out of 50 in the interview. Even though candidates perform exceptionally well in mains exam, couldn't able to qualify this exam merely because at interview stage they get 19, 19.6, 18, 17 etc. Similar, trend can be seen in MP civil judge exam
They publishes their result with following disclaimer
"Any application, even under the RTI Act, etc. with regard to the Preliminary Examination (Elimination Test) & Test of Gujarati Language, will not be entertained till completion of entire Recruitment Process"