Alright, since you want to compared for NLUD - Man Lachs (twice), OxPrice, OxIPR, ICC Trial, Henry Duanant Worlds, internationally. Apart from that, semis at Vis Vienna, Stetson, Frankfurt Arb and we've won nearly every national moot from NLSTIAM to DM Harish, KK Luthra etc. And the ADR/debating achievements are no less - Warsaw Negotiation, InADR, MukMem of Stephens, NLS Debate whatever else there is, we've won it/ done well in it. These wins are even better than what NALSAR has done so I think we're more than justified in being second only to NLS, that too because of age.

I recall what NUJS has achieved too, they've won both the Vis Moots twice (and the first two were before NLUD was even set up), ELSA WTO and Stetson Worlds. Certainly not bad from NUJS, but not better than NLUD especially comparing the last 10 years once NLUD had a full five batches every year. Look at the MPL between 2010-18, NLUD performed better than NUJS is most years.

Why don't you list the moot wins for NLUD and we will do the same for NUJS? Instead of making random claims? As for litigation scene, what's the parameter for doing better? You keep cooking up these claims without any real data in support. As for entrepreneurial examples, our students' efforts have been taught at Harvard Business School as a case study, so sucks to be your jealous sour grape self.

Look you can stoke the rivalry nonsense all you like. But atleast don't spew misinformation. NLUD has won way more prestigious moots/ADRs/debates than NUJS. Just look at even the erstwhile Mooting Premier League tables, NLUD has almost always ranked ahead of NUJS. Our litigation scene is way better than NUJS. We actually have batch toppers doing that unlike you guys where batch toppers go join only corp firms or LLMs. And don't even get me started on LLM scholarships and policy, that's also just as good. And if I am being honest, we'd much rather not have your LawSikho as a model of great entrepreneurship examples by our alumni.

To dust and clean those cubicles so that we can do legal work sitting there, bro. There is nothing that you're better at than anyone bro other than faking data. Sorry if that comes as news to you. Not placements, not winning competitions, not LLM scholarships, not entrepreneurship, not policy work and not litigation.

Answer the question than trying to bring in some teaching of your morality. The original comment slammed NLUJ saying GNLU is better and the response was to clarify how GNLU is much better. And there is no belittling of achievements here, people use all kinds of leverage to get scholarships. Nothing wrong with that, but I can't help it if you're hyper-sensitive and take it personally. That shows your insecurity.

Alright, maybe NLUJ isn't such a great place. But how exactly is GNLU that much better? Larger batch size with domicile, as expensive as NLUJ, hardly any major international moot wins compared to NLUJ and definitely behind the full-fledged tier-1s like NLUD and NLS, and the Rhodes scholars are great but it's clear Rhodes these days has a preference for persons from minority communities in places like India that can leverage their lived experiences in their applications. Not saying they don't have merit too, but both of GNLU's Rhodes are from minority Kashmir/Muslim communities of India. No doubt that played a major role in their selection.

The mentality of teaching students just entering the professional life work etiquette and conduct. If your ego gets hurt addressing your senior as sir/ma’am, are you sure you entered the correct career field? You just have a biggie to call them so for just your first month of law school. NLUJ’s culture trains you for the professional (corporate) legal world. The placement numbers speak for themselves