We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Personally, I donโt think thereโs much benefit to losing a year for NLS now. Almost all the opportunities at NLS are available to NLUD students. More importantly, NLS is massively increasing its intake to some 300 students in the 5 year course. While it may not dilute student quality entirely, it would definitely change the NLU experience. And Iโm not even referring to the fact that NLUD doesnโt have local state reservation unlike NLS were people with lesser ranks usually get through.
The one thing advantage of NLS now would be their faculty but with so many students, you may be in a section that doesnโt get the best professors sometimes. I think NLUD also has sections now but the batch size is still small. And NLS students were competing at the top even when itโs faculty wasnโt so good. Also, if youโre in first year now, you wouldโve joined in 2022 and youโll be writing CLAT 2024, no? So that means you wouldโve dropped two years before going to NLS, why would anyone do that? Like I said, sounds very trollish to me.
Treating this as a genuine query, it really depends on what you're aiming for after law school, though it may be too early for you to make this assessment.
Broadly, all T-1 NLUs will offer the same opportunities to you, so dropping a year for NLS won't really make a difference, especially if you're aiming for working in law firms going forward.
For litigation / judiciary, NLUD may be the better option, given you'll get more exposure to the same there. Can't comment too much about NLS on this count though.
The only thing I can imagine would make the change worth it may be if you're planning on shifting to academia, where NLS' alumni network may be of help to you.
TL;DR - there are very, very few situations where switching between any T-1 NLU will be worth it.
The top 4 are the only tier 1 NLUs is pretty much the general consensus.
As much as i dislike NUJS for its massive political interference and pathetic campus, the place makes up fro it with their placements and has a good lot of quality students.