We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
> The only people who believe in wokeism are either 13-year old TikTokers or people with the IQ of 13-year old TikTokers.
And clearly you are also one of the crazy people to believe in 'wokeism'. Please can you get a reality check: wokeism is barely even real and is probably not what you (and out-of-touch Fox News anchors) think it is and it's nowhere as big a problem as you think it is, neither is it the Culture World War 3 that some people are trying to elevate it as that will destroy the world.
Dispute its arguments on its merits if you must where relevant, but just doing ad hominem and whining about 13-year-old tik tokers and 'the wokes are mean to me' and the wokes will get me censored on LI is childish and trollish and pointless, so please develop a new approach / interests. :)
On the other hand, what is ▮▮▮? A lazy method of argumentation based on zero logic, whose only mission is to reject/cancel the above because they are associated with people who are "privileged". Instead, ▮▮▮ celebrates mediocrity and anarchy. The only people who believe in wokeism are either 13-year old TikTokers or people with the IQ of 13-year old TikTokers.
P.S. Moderator: if you censor my comment then shame on you!
Also, you talk about science as if you had a seat waiting for you at IITB's CSE program or something and left it to pursue law. Let's make this clear, you wouldn't have done well or earned a lot more in any other field either. You'd be like the overwhelming majority of uninspiring Indian engineers who don't have any idea of their own interests in life, perform mediocrely in college and live a meaningless lifestyle but are drawn to salary packages they read about in cheap magazines or crap TV shows.
The only useful humanities subject is foreign languages, which can be helpful for businesses and can help you migrate overseas. So IMO if at all law schools should teach BA courses it should be French, German etc.
The people who are making the world go around are already delving in all the tools and thinking systems and patterns evolved out of humanities, and which you are happily ignorant of, while not having attention spans longer than a minute to even read a single argument.
https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/long-live-humanities-8491361/