Read 16 comments as:
Filter By
lot of stuff that litigators do can be effectively automated - research to begin with. typing out pleadings once you feed in the facts.. rejoinders for sure.
"Potential detriment of society"

Dude konse justice system mein ji Rahe ho, go to any criminal court and here defence cross exams in rape cases lol.
Mark mine too, artificial intelligence can never be a match for natural stupidity.
Sure, right now it's a 12th grader, but soon it might be an NLS grad :)
If you have to ask, you will get replaced.

JK. But think about it. ChatGPT has the intellect of a 12th Grader studying for CLAT. It will miss the forest for the trees. Introspect.
Criminal law. Examination-in-chief, cross examination, closing arguments, strategy. Criminal law is the darkness which neither law firms nor tech dares enter.
Bruh,,,, mark my words,

Artificial Intelligence can never replace a Natural Intelligence!!
Sorry, what is the basis for this belief that apparently everyone else also shares?
It cant oppress its employees by treating them like poo
I believe (like everyone else) AI is more competent than lawyers in term of "Lawgical reasoning", but where we can defeat AI??

Can anyone suggest what are the things AI can't do in legal profession??