Read 14 comments as:
Filter By
There is no right to adverse possession here since the claim was successfully contested before the right fructified. What is seen here is lawlessness being promoted by the Supreme Court for political reasons.
In my opinion, other street and homeless people may demand land to allocate similar in line and as far as compassion is concerned then it must be extended to all people, not some chosen people. In India, there are millions of poor who like to take possession of the land.
Good if they do. It is obscene for some people to own acres of land and others left without home and shelter. The hundreds of rich have become thus at the expense of the millions of poor.
Are you not a lawyer/law student, or has the quality of our legal education so bad that you came to this conclusion?
Railways had no conclusive proof that it owned the land
Precedent toh set nahi hua abhi. SC ka final order toh aane de bhai. 🤦🏻‍♂️
You know you can make the same points without being trollish / a dick if you simply don't use language like 'tight slap'. Please mend your ways and participate more civilly in discussions in future.
All landless people born in this part ( India ) of the moving planet earth have natural right of land to live and it is responsibility of govt .
You are squatting here. How can I give you a 'tight slap'?