Didn't that ruling also say that NLSIU shouldn't have domicile quota and yet the university has that now? What use is that judgment in exercise of questionable judgement by a fanboy judge?
Once you go abroad, nobody cares which Indian law school you have done your LLB from. As for alumni working abroad, even other NLUs like NALSAR and NUJS, other public universities like DU and private universities like Symbiosis have scores of alumni working in different parts of the world now. So no law school is either the so-called face or even the backside of the 'global Indian lawyer'.
I think this is an interesting question. Which law school is the face of the global Indian lawyer, akin to the global Indian techie at Silicon Valley (IIT product) or the global Indian CEO in London and NY (IIT/IIM product)? This naturally means not just people who got training contracts after their LLB, but also people who did Masters degrees abroad and are working there. The second category is a lot larger than the first. It is equally applicable to IITs and IIMs, as only a small number of IIT and IIM alumni get recruited abroad directly. The majority do a Master's abroad as a ticket to settling there (e.g. Sundar Pichai, Parag Agrwal, Indra Nooyi etc).
So which law school tops the list? Possibly NLSIU now, but perhaps soon to be overtaken by JGLS, because of the huge numbers of JGLS doing their master's abroad?
So which law school tops the list? Possibly NLSIU now, but perhaps soon to be overtaken by JGLS, because of the huge numbers of JGLS doing their master's abroad?