We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Do they do professional lobbying behind the think tank name? What's thier influence in lawmaking in India?
Any other secrets (open) or new is welcome.
NEGATIVES:
- He merely wrote speeches for ministers, prepared PPTs for bureaucrats, wrote newspaper articles for senior Vidhi staff and organised conferences. Genuine policy research (if done) is usually disregarded, as our bureaucrats are resistant to outside experts and our ministers are uneducated people who can barely read.
- Vidhi sucks up to whoever is in power. Earlier close to Veerappa Moily and Salman Khurshid, then Jaitley and RS Prasad, now whoever. The next Vidhi talk is by Bibek Debroy, a hardcore Modi supporter, on "decolonising" the Constitution or something like that (pet theme of J Sai Deepak and RW brigade). So that tells you what you need to know. You will always see articles by Vidhi in news articles blandly stating facts and rarely criticising the government.
POSITIVES:
- Vidhi has "access", as ministers/bureaucrats are thankful to them for helping them out with speeches and PPTs (usually for free). This "access" leads to a lot of funding.
- This funding, in turn, leads to a good salary for junior staff. So a good career option for those who don't want to work in law firms.
- Good work hours and nice superiors. The organisation is run by NLU grads and grads of foreign universities, so they are a lot more understanding, progressive and modern than Lala law firm owners (who are just slavedrivers).
- Good place to work in if you want to get a scholarship abroad.
As for your weird 90s India assumptions "bureaucrats are resistant to outside experts and our ministers are uneducated people who can barely read." would request you to check the qualifications of our ministers and lateral secretaries in the government. `Also perhaps the kind of "public policy" work CAM does.
Thirdly your conclusions based on "NLU" leadership is quite misleading. These NLUs have crowded several senior partners at the "Lala law firms" who disprove your point vehemently.
As for funding, I literally dont see you criticising foreign funding of the "non ruling" parties. the FEMA violations etc.
Again, this is not a comment on Vidhi and I know very little about them. It's just a comment on corporate funding.
The latest Briefing Book which has been mentioned in comments is here and once again, you're free to draw your own conclusions.