We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Hope her reality is revealed soon
2. The reasoning stated by Greta seems BS because you can't possibly make every country stop emitting GHGs in such a short period of time. It's process, I agree that 2050 as a target might not be the most ambitious one but the efforts are being made by majority of the countries.
3. Talk about overhyping OP. COP is the best possible way that could enable world to counter global warming as a cohesive unit. What do you think would happen if COP gets abolished? Do you think that voters struggling to make an ends meet give a sh*t about global warming, ig not. It would result in a world with no accountability of local leaders.
Quote: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/31/greta-thunberg-to-skip-greenwashing-cop27-climate-summit-in-egypt
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/11/02/greta-thunberg-time-overthrow-wests-oppressive-racist-capitalist/