We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
And you've actually been caught with your pants down after saying that the alumni approved the expansion plan, and you're now backtracking saying that VC doesn't need to get their approval. And you're calling me a lair? Lol. He also pulled the NLAT out of the blue, didn't he? And an alum himself argued against it before the SC. Grow up, kid. Neither you nor your institution are as great or important as you believe you are. Just a mere state-level university trying to stand out because it's older than the rest.
If you genuinely didn't care, you wouldn't be spending time on boards like this spreading patent lies. And you definitely wouldn't have spent time writing about how much you didn't care in response to a comment. That takes effort.
The VC doesn't need to get alumni approval for every single decision he makes. I don't need to support everything he does. The alumni isn't a monolith. Only plain idiots will talk as though they are.
But you don't really care about that? You don't do you? You don't care at all.
He had held all these presentations only after getting the Plan passed by the GC, as per my sources. So even if people resisted, it wasn't going to change much then. With all due respect, I don't really care for NLS enough to troll about it and I also don't think it's nearly as special or unique as guys like you think it is. It's just older than the rest.
This is patently untrue. You are just pulling that right out of your ass aren't you?
Sudhir as VC had conducted well attended online Alumni presentations where he discussed his expansion plans in detail. He was open to opinions as well.
Just saying fake shit doesn't make it true. Jobless troll.
- The way students protested against injustices by faculty, e.g. V Nagaraj and Shortsgate
- The way students/alumni united and protested to get Sudhir appointed, with an alum even meeting SC judges
- The way alumni are lobbying for exclusive National status for NLSIU and got the BCI to support their claim in the Karnataka HC. Alumni and ASG Vikramjit Banerjee argued in the Karnataka HC that only NLU is a National university, other law schools like NALSAR and NUJS are states ones, which the Karnataka HC upheld. The matter is now before the SC and alumni are similarly arguing for exclusive National status.
- The way alumni are donating in recent years
- The Covid airline evacuation of migrants through the then TATA GC
- In general, the way alumni back each other and the institution ,whether in good times (job market, foreign scholarships etc) or bad (#MeToo scandal involving an alum)
Do we see this unity in the case of other NLUs?