We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Reality- Very low in-hand, Work life balance depends on your manager (just like in private), no career progression because you are a cost- centre. Absolutely no learning curve. You will only be fixing dates and getting on calls so that the business can explain things to "legal" (which won't be you).
If you want money- go for law firms/ inhouse.
If you want work life balance- go for academics/ setting independent practice. ( Struggle initially but get rewarded later)
If you want neither and can settle for selling your self- respect to make cents- go for PSUs.
A PSU legal role is not for those who are highly ambitious, aggressively career-driven, or ready to face the heat of litigation or the high-pressure environment of a tier-1 or tier-2 law firm.
However, for someone from a middle-class background with a practical outlook, the ability to adjust, and a willingness to let go of ego, it can offer a stable and respectable career.
Pros:
1. Decent and stable salary with timely increments and allowances.
2. Low to moderate workload, allowing for a better work-life balance.
3. Job security and structured working hours.
4. Sustainable work environment where an average performer can survive comfortably.
Cons:
1. Slower career progression compared to core technical or managerial staff.
2. Limited role in decision-making, mostly restricted to advisory functions.
3. Lack of recognition within the organizationβs hierarchy.
4. Stagnation risk if one doesnβt actively seek growth beyond routine work.
but, like you said, these teams arent exactly known for their rigour. even compared to other in-house teams, the learning curve is much, much flatter. it's not so much legal work as managerial work. public works contracts are handled by the tech specialists, lawyers dont have much of a role. its more of managing licenses/clearances and managing ongoing arbitrations/litigations (hiring firms, empanelling counsels, collecting and producing relevant docs to them and coordinating with them etc).
tbh, i didnt mind even that. i was okay with it. my bigger problem was working in a government setup. it's a lot of trying to explain very basic things to people who dont want to listen to you. and promotions are hardly ever based on merit. in general, people in non-core departments at psus are sorta washed up, imo. i cant work with them. this is what kept me from going for it. otherwise the gig itself wasnt bad.
(oh and there was also the fact that to get into a psu, you have to get a rank in top 50 in clat pg. it isnt v difficult, but yeah requires at least 3-4 months of solid prep. i didnt want to put that much effort in for something i was so unsure about.)
The worst part is the working environment. Incompetency and sycophancy go hand in hand. Moreover, people having powerful connections will get good postings and others will rot in unproductive and repetitive paper work. Every year, you'll ask yourself if you have learned anything at all. The answer would be that you have forgotten all the skills you had back in the day and have learned nothing new. Moreover, getting shouted at by incompetent bosses for no fault of yours, s*cks! Personally, I had reached a place where my younger brother made thrice my yearly income and used to be 10X satisfied with his work. PSUs are not the way forward. Merit is never almost never rewarded. Anyone who knows a minister/bureaucrat gets ahead in the line. Way Ahead.
My advice- Be very careful while making this decision. If you wish to stay at a PSU all your life (& suffer the consequences), then feel free to join. A change in career midway is almost impossible. The pay is attractive now but it will be insufficient to meet your expectations and relatively much less when compared to your peers who would have climbed up the ladder in Firms/Litigation. If you have an option of joining a firm, please join it asap. The PSU I had joined had made me sign a bond for 3 years. I thought I'd leave after that. But by then no one needs you! You'll be trapped. Sad but true! Hope, you guys save yourselves from this tragedy! Best.