Read 19 comments as:
Filter By
Yes it is more rewarding in the short term than being a junior to a lawyer.
Berozgaar baitho dear 😘 ya phir LI pe comment karke TIME UTILIZE Karo dear😘
Save 10 Lakh on education and save 15 lakh being an agniveer.

By the age of 23 you will be 25 lakh better off compared to a law graduate. :)

Usk baad ka fir bhagwan bharose.
If you’d literally rather be maimed and devastated on the frontlines than pick up a teaching/ policy/ inhouse/ literally any other kind of job, go for it
Why aren’t junior advocates setting fire to trains and demanding better pay from senior advocates?
1 cr + permanent family pension + shaheed kehlaoge + proud parents
A simple look around your peers will also betray that lawyering as a profession did not attract the brightest minds and neither does it now. One thing we probably are very good at is being snobby and arrogant and that really comes out in your comment.
No. But do your BA.LLB after your tour of duty. You will find seniors very easily. Every Advocate has a soft spot for the Armed Forces.
having no job is financially better than being a junior of any advocate in gneenral.
Your question betrays a simple mind.
I think you're better off being an 'Agniveer'.
ye kaisa sawal hai? Tumhe 19 saal k umar mein kaun HC junior bana raha hai? 22 mein toh law school se graduate hoge and agniveer ki age limit hai 21 saal (unless iss saal jaane ki soch rahe ho).
Agniveers will get free housing and food, plus 10 lakhs savings after 4 years. Will I save more by being an Agniveer than a HC lawyer's junior? What about a trial court lawyer's junior?