We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I would request Kian to make sure this doesn't happen or else you will attract wrong type of crowd here and the platform will lose its quality, which it already has. This platform used to be a bridge between law students and associates/partners/judges/litigators. People would get to learn a lot of things and also would great insight. Now though, it's increasingly becoming toxic, people start moronic threads and then go into a hating spree, LI is slowly turning into a bad version of Twitter and the moderation has a huge role in its degradation.
- R
Bestie I hesitate to ask, but do you consider it cancellation for a private party to decide what goes on a private website that they host and run and you don’t pay for? Just wait till you hear about this terrifying thing called free enterprise. You will be shook.
While I am also against RW trolls and hate speech, these moderating standards have stooped even lower.
The quality of moderation was bearable until recently.
While I also agree that the individuals working for LI should have their own opinions and should be allowed to express them freely but they should not do that from the account of LI (the Moderator). It is a disservice to the users of LI and to the platform.
I am starting to search for an alternative forum.