We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Make no mistake - there are plenty of exceptionally brilliant attorneys (and successful people in other arenas of life) that are from the so-called lower castes, but who are meritorious, and this post does not apply to them. The problem is with people who are not meritorious enough to cut it, and are given preferential treatment that puts them in a place where they are simply not good enough.
Leftism ko pichwade ke andar dal do.
Have you questioned why not? Have you considered any reasons for the quick departure apart from "merit"?
Grades are the worst way to predict your competence. Some bookworms will get into firms if grades are used as a criteria.