We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Now don't act like Hansa and ask for the meaning of 'litigator'. Btw, it doesn't mean an alligator who eats litti chokha.
Agar 3.1 ki query padhni hi hai, it clearly says "apart from the obvious massive one that one can't make appearances, sign vakalat(nama)".
If your answer to "apart from X" is "X", you're not answering the query.
Regardless, you're being unnecessarily rude. I hope everything is alright.
- R
1. Not being able to file vakalatnama and make appearances. That shouldn't be a big problem if you're in a corporate firm. But it does come handy when you want to go to court, or a file an application for a friend/family/yourself.
2. Not being able to sign and issue legal opinions. Again, not a problem till you're a partner in a corporate firm.
3. Applying outside law firms/in-house roles. Since there are enough lawyers to sign on your behalf in a law firm, it's not a problem. But if you're the only/few lawyers working in-house at a company, they'd better expect you to be an actually registered lawyer.
4. GST problems for the firm - the firm requires your enrollment number for certain GST deductions and filings while paying your retainer. But again, if your firm isn't bothering you, then not a problem again.
5. Years of experience required for many legal posts (say senior advocate, judge, government counsels etc.) is usually calculated on years after enrollment. That might be a problem if you're interested in these posts later in your career.
The context of the question is obviously "what would I lose if I don't enrol myself and continue to work at a firm, and get myself registered whenever I switch to litigation".
Which I have already answered in another comment - eligibility for appointments.
So the sooner, the better.
I hope the profession is treating you well.
Could you please elaborate on the problems a litigator might face (apart from the obvious massive one that one can't make appearances, sign vakalat)