We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
The OP in this thread did not promise placements, he's said the extent to which RGNUL will improve remains to be seen. I do not see how that js propaganda, since it logically follows that good measures for the students will definitely lead to atleast some improvement.
How many times have firms had the opportunity to visit the campus under Bajpai? Zero.
Even if Bajpai does the bare minimum of simply inviting law firms, it will be a massive improvement to Jaswal's policy of refusing firms a place to stay in the guest house while they visit the campus to recruit.
And even by your inaccurate estimate, placements might pick up after 3-4 years, which will benefit the "existent bacha log". That is exactly what I'm saying, so how am I lying to them?
Mr. Bajpai, you should start by evaluating your own Registrar who teaches pathetically. I can vouch that the even the dumbest Ast. prof is way better than the Registrar at teaching.
To be honest, Registrar post should be left vacant instead of hiring such smartys.
And yes, Lets not get away by saying that Registrar's job is to manage the University and stuff, as he is clearly incapable of doing that as well! I guess you too are well aware of the same, LOL.
Jokes apart, Mr. Bajpai, RGNUL Students are brilliant, its the teachers and the Registrar who have made RGNUL this huge a blunder!
Lastly, just a suggestion, let's start the cleaning from the top, shall we? Right from our dear most honorable and venerated ultra smart & professional Registrar.
Please Kian and R don't mark this as Troll or Facts Contested, it really undermines the message I am trying to convey. Please. LI can really become a platform for bringing about reforms in academic institutions. Thanks LI.
I think you might be good guy, for a change!
But what are u planning to do about the teachers who already have been hired by Jaswal? Majority of them (Ast. profs) are good-for-nothing and lack even the basic knowledge of law. Pathetic would be the right word to describe them. I remember one Ast. Prof even acknowledged shamelessly that she hadn't opened the Bare Act ( Bare Minimum) for several years! Another prof(Hint-Love) is totally clueless and reads her ppts in class like a parrot (Not to mention her inability to answer the basic question asked in class).
Moreover, even the constitutional law profs who used to be good are not putting in the effort! Fuller Sir seems alright, but the other one (Hint-Lucky) talks rubbish all the time and asks students stupid questions totally unrelated to the topic involved.
I'm sorry to say this but I think even an average 2nd year student can teach in a better manner than the majority of teacher at RGNUL. The profs are undoubtedly the filth of RGNUL and until and unless they are removed, RGNUL will remain the same boring stupid place academically.
Also, many of the teachers talk in Punjabi/Hindi during teaching.
To summarize, RGNUL has profs who are incapable of satisfactorily conveying even the basic knowledge of law (which too majority of profs lack). Basically, No Communication Skills, No Research Skills, No Knowledge about law and not eligible to be in an NLU.
That's RGNUL for you. Hope you understand.
No so Warm Regards,
A Pissed Off Student
Placements almost non existent bacha log and will remain so for atleast 3-4 years.
However, under Bajpai, things are definitely going to improve, although it remains to be seen to what extent.
Since his arrival, Bajpai has hired new professors, started new cells, implemented a more rigorous academic curriculum, introduced several changes to the teaching pedagogy, initiated student-friendly reimbursement policy for competitions, and promised to work on placements, among a host of other changes.
I am hopeful that RGNUL will finally achieve it's potential and shake off its stagnancy.
Now the not so great part. The only quality professor (at least during my time) were Prof M Sharma and Prof Mahajan. Then there were passable professors like Prof V Kumar, T Mander, S Taak, Late KC Garg, and S Dhaliwal (may have missed a few more). Generally, the BA professors overall were of significant better pedigree compared to the law professors. I obviously cannot speak of the new hires. However, the majority of the law profs (who remain till date) are not only bad, they are idiots. They will fail to work as an A0 in a tier 3 firm or a new joinee in an advocate's chamber. Their knowledge of law is 0. They mostly just read the bare act out in class or read out RK Bangia (actually happened). Some professors even used to make us watch movies, play dumb charades to pass time (in IV / V year specialisation classes). So, if you want good quality academic guidance - dont go to RGNUL. The general academic culture is pretty shitty too - publications both internal and external are all CCP there is almost no independent intellectual thought. Even the PhD candidates are shitty. Every year people do research on the bloody same topic - the future of criminal justice in India (or some variation of it). If the college / PhD candidates did any actual research - RGNUL would have become a flag bearer of criminal law jurisprudence in India. Unfortunately, the culture of this college is extremely non-academic. Further, as drugs and hard liquor flow like water, the general temperament of students are also pretty bad. Very few motivated kids there and therefore, the college sees very few success in placements or representations in law firm / chambers. Most kids from RGNUL are genuinely not or any merit.
But if you are good and focussed, you can achieve placements on your own. While RGNUL boasts very very few good quality alumni - most of the good kids have ended up in tier 1 firms after graduation. The representation of RGNUL in law firms is low - because very very few motivated and good students graduate from it. This is not to say that good kids do not enter RGNUL. The academic and general culture of the Uni causes most students to lose focus and wash away. But - if you can balance the vices, it is a great place.
BTW, had a great time there and drank my liver out. Will recommend 10/10.
Again all these are so called tier 2 NLUs (prolly tier 3 if you consider NLUJ, GNLU, Bhopal as tier 2), hence your placements are ensured only if you slog hard and not because you have the NLU/NUL tag on the top left of your CV cover, therefore you won't commit cardinal sin with choosing any over other.
Hope that helps:) Happy law school life to you
- R
It seems that R in RGNUL stand for Rahul.
(Note- Pun intended, No Offence to anyone!)
I heard placements are non-existent and quality of faculty is also pathetic.
So I ask again, How good is it?
Also, a comparison of RGNUL with RML,HNLU, NLUO would be great!
On a lighter side, Does it even deserve to be called an NLU (Given that it is an NUL!!)