We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Do not, however, expect T1 pay. Representing traders associations only gets you so much billing
Might be used as an option to break into the practice area if you're really keen but a bit fraught with risk to try that route
B. "Reflected in the court orders" - his most popular representation until now would be for the trade association against Flipkart and Amazon. The others are also against market places. It's actually a great place to be going against an e-commerce platform (barring from a billing POV) and the likes considering the overall trends in enforcement globally. Not to take away from the hard work that he and his team undoubtedly put in but global enforcement trends are a fact
C. There are some "T1" firms who actually do decent enforcement work but barely have any merger control work. Their work product and pay is also far better (comp. practitioners might know who this is about)
I think he shouldn't be compared with a tier. -1 as they do merger control matters. As rightly said in other comment, assess him from a litigators perspective.
A big thumbs up for Abir's Skill. Have heard him argue and his skills reflect in favourable orders given to him by court.
I showed him this comment above (by Guest) about the quality of Information being poor His exact words when I showed him the comment was thanks for the feedback, will definitely improve. Then I asked him who may have written it, he said I have filed some information in recent past must be one of the lawyers involved in top Tier law firms who are representing the defendants.