We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
But otherwise, becoming a litigator and then appearing for higher judicial services/ getting elevated is better because of the following:
A. Higher Judicial Services
1. The post of Addl. Dist Judge requires minimum qualification of 7 years as a litigator. Through lower judicial services with promotions, you'll get to the same rank after around 15 years.
2. It is easy to crack the higher judicial exam even with the minimum 7 years PQE, because most lawyers with a good practice, do not want to sit for another exam.
3. Consequently, you'll be an Addl Dist Judge and then subsequently Dist Judge with a 6-7 years advantage over your other DJs. Your chances of elevation to HC is almost certain.
B. Elevation to High Court directly
Join as a government advocate. The pay will be much lesser (a decent 60k though) but most of your peers will be of shit quality. It's a very easy way to stand out before the bench - every judge and advocate general will remember you as that "one smart, dedicated government advocate". Play your cards right and you might elevated to the HC pretty early on - around 45-50 years age. In that case, you'll even have a shot at elevation to the Supreme Court.
But the vacancies are ridiculously low. Just 4 candidates have been shortlisted for interview for DHJS this time.
Most importantly, you do not become an government advocate right away; there is a minimum experience pre condition to be satisfied.
Go to the courts for six months and decide what suits you better. In the end, there is nothing right or wrong, if you do not compare the name, money and fame enjoyed by people around you with that of yours.
Even if a career in the judicial services is what you aspire for, a few years of litigation experience under good mentors will help you be a better judge someday. Good luck.
Wait for the recommendations of the Second Judicial pay commission to kick in the salary will be around 90k in hand.
I understand that vacancies in higher judiciary and becoming a government advocate are again very state specific things.
1. The vacancies in higher judiciary in states apart from Delhi are generally higher and in some states, they are not even filled because qualifying candidates do not fulfil the minimum mark/percentage requirements. So, if you are a resident of those states, you may be luckier.
2. Traditionally, GAs were politically appointed; however that is changing in many states. States like Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Odisha are now almost regularly carrying out GA recruitments through examinations. Even if not GA specifically, you can also explore applying to Assistant Public Prosecutor positions - they much lesser min qualification requirements and it's very easy to stand out as long as you're ready to take the pay cut. The comment on GA will also apply if you become an APP.