We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
~ R
` R
For eg I cleared CLAT in my first attempt. Along with UPSC I cleared CAT with 98 percentile. I chose civil services for my personal reasons, but could have been in an IIM. So I assume that I am an otherwise a smart candidate, with great GK, presence of mind, logical and mathematical aptitude. The only thing that prevented me from becoming IAS was that I could not capture large chunks of information in my head. My answers would not have data that someone like Tina Dabi could throw away at the drop of a hat. I failed to clear prelims on two occasions again because of the same thing. Had it been a test of just aptitude or logic I would have cleared it. But it is more than that. May be rightly so.