We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Has things changed since then? Has Jindal admin student friendly/sensitive or does it remain the same?
Nice that you reposted that open letter though. Unfortunately, Kian has disabled comments on the original post. I wonder how much Jindal paid LegallyIndia, probably part of the money LI got for carrying the Number 1 law school advertisements :)
Legallyindia rarely carries any student complain when JGLS students reach out to them. It's only reasonable to assume there's some bias there :)
Ask any JGLS student for details. There's an entire email and video about it
1. Admitting 70-80 students per section which is more than the BCI limit of 60 students
2. Not providing fee breakdown (UGC requirement)
3. Retrospectively changing scholarship policy
4. Hostel, library seating infra not as per rules
5. Not appointing an ombudsman as per UGC rules
6. Sexual Harassment Committee not having an NGO member. There's a NGO member named but that person has no idea they're actually part of the SHC and were under the impression that it got dissolved two years back. The SHC (named COGSASH in Jindal) also doesn't publish a report that is mandated by law
I am not sure if the concerned individual has tried approaching UGC and BCI. However, many alumni have tried to bring this to their attention during their time at Jindal. They were either bullied by Jindal admin or UGC/BCI just turned a blind eye to their complaints (possibly under pressure from Jindal)
This post just mentions the allegations. You really can't be so overtly supporting Jindal. I remember a time when LI was a free space.
Thanks
R
Verify it from these links if you want. Please remember that the comment is saying that a student has made allegations. Don't now ask me to go and verify these allegations also (although any JGU student can do that as well)
1. https://twitter.com/sivm2021/status/1432578486607089666
2. https://www.instagram.com/p/CTIGtl4JvB9/
Hope all the Jindal lovers finally wake up and see what a despicable place it is. Btw @Kian/LI - Hope you don't moderate this as "facts contested" and finally see what kind of people you are in bed with. Please cut your ties with Jindal. Why do you want to be associated with an institute that is harassing people?
Ciao.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rahul-verma-76638921b_education-law-india-activity-6838385716033073152-Kofs
They are even fine with sexual harassment claims against prof and set bar extremely high if you have to report against a professor, such so that you can never prove and they can punish you.
The professors at Jindal are very superficial in their nature, they will communicate something and mean something else, they will betray students trust. But will happily use their tuition money for research which is what Jindal is only interested in. Professors will happily see students sucide, get students fee, high salary and research money.