We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
I will only change my vote if a new centre-right/centrist, free-market, talent-rich party is formed. The party should be led by eminent scientists, economists, doctors, lawyers and retired army people. Alternatively, Rahul Gandhi and his chelas can step own and hand over the Congress to these people.
Its funny when bjp supporters pretend that support bjp because there is no good alternative and every alternative is leftist anti national.
1. scientists,
2. economists,
3. doctors,
4. lawyers and
5. retired army people?
But you would also vote for the exact opposite, a party largely led by uneducated and unqualified career politicians (Modi), godmen (Adityanath) and extreme Hindutva fringe elements (Pragya Thakur) and many more combining all three characteristics that has proven in the last years again by words and actions that they don't really believe in
1. modern science (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/28/indian-prime-minister-genetic-science-existed-ancient-times),
2. economics (demonetisation, sacking Raghuram Rajan, botched GST implementation, crippling of economy by draconian first lockdown etc),
3. actual doctors and modern medical science (the party's shambolic coronavirus virus responses are most recent example: https://scroll.in/article/995510/ramachandra-guha-modis-hindutva-irrationality-makes-indias-war-on-covid-19-even-more-difficult)
4. rule of law (CAA, farm bill parliamentary procedure, politicisation of Supreme Court, persecution of NGOs and media, Kashmir and Delhi government disenfranchisement, police violence and biased prosecutions in the Delhi CAA protests and riots, persecution of freedom of speech over 'toolkits', etc),
5. understanding military strategy and defending India's borders (see China encroachment and botched Pakistan 'surgical strikes' held purely for political purposes).
1. Deleted : I called the CPIM Chinese stooges.
Proof:
- The very formation of CPIM itself (when it broke away from CPI) is because it supported China during the 1962 war. Every student of history nows that. Their motto was "China's chairman (Mao) is our chairman".
Poster here: https://twitter.com/greatbong/status/1273059957491920897
- In an interview to ScoopWhoop Sitaram Yechury defended China from the well-established allegations of Uyghur genocide
[link redacted]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I5URqXwco1E
- In an interview to OpIndia CPIM leader Rabin Deb says:It was a lie that COVID-19 started in China. Now, WHO has investigated and declared that COVID-19 did not start from China.
[link redacted]
2. Deleted: I called the AIMIM ISF etc Islamic fundamentalists.
Proof:
- CNBC on Abas Siddiqui (founder of ISF): "He called for the flogging of actor and Trinamool Congress MP Nusrat Jahan and said she made money by selling her body. He described Kolkata Mayor Firhad Hakim as an infidel, apostate and shameless for participating in a community Durga Puja and came out in support of those who beheaded a school teacher in France for showing cartoons of the Prophet."
https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/politics/explained-what-does-controversial-cleric-abbas-siddiquis-poll-plunge-mean-for-bengal-6614011.html
- Video of Abbas Siddiqui saying so:
[link redacted]
- As for AIMIM, party chief Asaduddin Owaisi's brother Akbaruddin Owaisi assaulted Taslima Nasreen. Asaduddin then proudly posted the video on his Facebook. Proof below:
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=509145865837349
3. I said that a bunch of Tamil parties were LTTE supporters.
Proof:
- MDMK's Vaiko Sentenced To 1 Year In Jail For 2009 Pro-LTTE Speech
https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/india-news-mdmks-vaiko-sentenced-to-1-year-in-jail-for-2009-pro-ltte-speech/333619
- Hindustan Times: Vaiko has been an undisguised supporter of the LTTE
https://www.hindustantimes.com/delhi/vaiko-has-been-an-undisguised-supporter-of-the-ltte/story-Cw3vev8ctxwIEIg8QXAoUP.html
- ANI report (with photo):
TN polls: Late LTTE leader Prabhakaran's cut-outs seen in election campaigns
https://www.aninews.in/news/national/politics/tn-polls-late-ltte-leader-prabhakarans-cut-outs-seen-in-election-campaigns20210325145439/
The comment regarding the CPIM appears to be mostly political propaganda based on unverified information from 60 years ago: https://www.freepressjournal.in/india/chinas-chairman-is-our-chairman-why-china-will-forever-haunt-cpim
Other 'proof' about original claims appears to rely primarily on a website that regularly publishes unverified information, and in this case the article linked to in support is not a bona fide report but clear misrepresentation and distortions of what was actually said in the video and its intent.
Regarding the TN-related claim, prima facie OP's evidence is not sufficient to claim that all Tamil Nadu based parties ending with a K meet the OP's allegation.
End of the day, we welcome political debate on LI but obvious political propaganda or fake news that is not verifiable, factual or relies on questionable sources or uses language or arguments that are obviously in bad faith will be moderated.