Speaking as someone who did exactly that (many years ago), and is still in London - don't come here for the money or the opportunities. On a PPP basis, the money is better in India, the tax is lower, AND it's a growing economy so there are more opportunities (better chances of making partner and a "big" career if that's what you want).

Things that ARE better here: Much better quality of work, much better training, much less lala family politics in the office and far more professional (politics will always be there anywhere humans work - but much better than Indian family firms). Comfortable life (not rich), no pollution, the power doesn't go out, the streets are clean, the public services (mostly) work without corruption. Basically you can live your life in peace without most the daily hassles of Indian life. Also if it matters to you - far more diverse, much greater range of interesting people from all over the world, incredible cultural opportunities and the chances to pursue any hobby you have (art, music, literature, sports, you name it) with the best people in the world.

Basically you don't come to London for the money - you come for the lifestyle.

Don't worry about nonsense re immigration and racism. No place is perfect but this is probably the least racist place on Earth and in the circles you'll move in as a City lawyer, racism is non existent (and even in other circles, it's mostly a class issue - directed at the illegals coming in boats across the Channel, not high earning City lawyers).

First two reasons are valid.

Third one, I can understand about the anti-immigration mood fluctuations, many people wouldn't want the psychological uncertainty and instability that results from that sort of thing - and yes, it comes with the territory. But this "second class citizen" language is putting this very strongly, and definitely does not reflect my personal experience (I am not saying this to contradict you, but putting forward my own perspective). I live in London and have done so for the last five years (and yes, I read the London Times, Guardian and Financial Times every day, so I definitely don't live under a rock here). But I haven't felt like a "second class citizen", ever. Perhaps it's because of my visible disability, but in many ways, I have felt more like a first class citizen in Britain than I ever did in India (and I spent about 80% of my life in India - wasn't one of the privileged [family network-wise and financially] disabled people of earlier generations from India and Israel educated from childhood in the UK).

No.

1. On a PPP basis. You are far more rich in a tier 1 shop in India than a Magic Circle firm in London.

2. Work culture and Hours - if you think magic circle or AM100 lawyers have it easy you are wrong. Law firms are horrible to work at even in Germany (country with most WLB)

3. Far more easy to grow in India - UK, US law firms have saturated. Especially in the UK - legal market cannot grow any further.

Indian legal market will be growing super fast in the coming years. In 30 years I won't be surprised if Trilegal/CAM/Khaitan individually has 1000+ partners and 6000+ associates.

If you are somewhat competent you will make partner in an Indian firm.

I actually left London. Not because India is better, but because I belong to the privileged 0.01% elite nepo kids of the country. Wealthy parents, house in GK, servants, maids, Merc with chauffeur, invites to high-society parties, Delhi Golf Club membership etc. Plus an IAS in the family to help me out whenever I need any paperwork done. Also, I spend a month in Europe every year, soaking up the culture which we so lack in India. Plus 2 weeks in winter in Dubai, Phuket, Bali, Sydney etc.

Only leave the UK for India if you have this kind of life. Else, get the f*** out of India and save yourselves.

The profit sharing you are referring to is the factor system at LKS. The monthly collection target for each team is set at 3x the team’s monthly cost. This is how it works - from PA and above, 20% of the monthly compensation is variable. Consider this - if a team’s monthly cost is 1 million, the monthly collection target is 3 million. In this team, if your monthly pay is 100k, you will get 80k as fixed pay every month. It’s the 20k component (20% variable) which will vary. If your team achieves its full monthly target i.e. 1x, you get full 20k. If your team achieves 2x target, you get 40k, and so on. This is a good policy on paper. The reality is different. If your team achieves only 50% of the target, you get only 10k, and so on. So, you don’t just share profit, you suffer the loss also. The 3x target is anyway high for every team and very few teams manage to achieve it and if they do, it is limited to only a few months in a year and this phenomenon of exceeding target is generally seen in Jan to March period when pressure to collect fee from clients is high.

This is not at all true.

Even post increase in salary LKS stands nowhere close to any tier 1 firm.

For instance the remuneration offered to A0 at LKS is 14 LPA + Bonus (at max 1/1.5 lakh) which is nowhere close to SAM (20 lakhs), Khaitan (22.5 lakhs), Trilegal (19.5 lakhs).

Moreover the salary growth trajectory at LKS is much slower than any other firm (leave tier 1 firms).

None. Academia is never a better career. You earn less, work more on useless stuff, barely have time to research what you like, teach absolute morons, tackle with administration delays, sometimes are not paid for months, politics will keep you down. In the end, every job suks but atleast the high pay compensates for that. As someone who always wanted to get into academia and got in, I suggest not to get in.

Next to none, unless you are willing to take a significant cut to your PQE. There is practically not a single aspect (other than general contract law and drafting) that you are good at, and which will be of use in a GC/ M&A team. I say this from experience, as I work very closely with projects teams on projects/ infra M&A matters. You will be lacking knowledge of the companies act and FEMA which is basically the bread and butter for any GC/ M&A lawyer. There are enough nuances in these subjects for any lawyer to take 4-5 years to achieve a level of proficiency sufficient to barely manage a mundane DD or transaction, let along complex structuring. In fact, the reverse happens quite often - where lawyers ditch GC/ M&A to enter other transactional practice areas like real estate, TMT, projects etc.

Do you agree with the view of Dhruv Rathee, Afra Khanun Sherwani of the Wire, and various intellectuals and influencers that it is an average film that demonises Muslims and does propaganda for the BJP?

https://www.cnbctv18.com/photos/entertainment/dhurandhar-becomes-highest-grossing-single-language-indian-film-top-10-indian-box-office-hits-19816263.htm/amp

Because according to most of the Indians he is an anti national and the reason for this perception was that doctored video of him which was completely false , they don't understand the stringent provisions of UAPA and that absurd interpretation by supreme court and the country now started liking savarkar's hindutva ideology which is very much different from actual hinduism

Terrible comment, which should be downvoted 200 times.

FACT: MBAs head the world's biggest companies, lawyers don't.

FACT: MBAs are paid much higher than law grads.

FACT: MBA degrees are much more useful than law degrees if you want to migrate abroad .

FACT: MBAs give you access to many different types of careers.

FACT: MBAs are far more respected in Indian society than lawyers.

LI: you really need to disable voting on your comments.

I am frustrated with SCC's speed matchign that of a computer from 1990s. I wish a better competitor takes over its whole market share. Its an epitome of mediocrity in terms of speed and delivery. While it provides a folder feature, it doesnt let you mass select cases in one click by a simple feature of 'select all' and then deselect

What is your basis for saying the upper castes are in the minority? If 10-20% of the general population comprise 30-40% is that them being in the minority? By this logic, Parsis (an affluent and influential community) in education and the workforce are certainly in the minority. Do we make a hue and about this? The problem is of over-representation and under-representation, and had you read the article this would be clear to you.

It’s very simple, guys. Upper castes are fewer in number in India. They tend to have fewer children, because they have historically had higher levels of education. The more educated people are, the less children they usually have, because of awareness about family planning and access to contraception. Plus late marriage and lower fertility.

In contrast, lower castes have historically had lower levels of education. As a result, they fell behind when it came to family planning and birth control. Hence, we have a large mismatch in our demographics: a small number of upper castes and a large number of lower castes, because the latter have had families with more children. Aside from reservation, the sheer numerical difference explains the data from the IIM study.

This is also one of the reasons we should think about reservation for Muslims descended from lower castes.

No, this information is not accurate.

1. Not just lateral hirings, all hirings require timing and luck. If anything, lateral hirings are the most meritorious, far more than day 0s and PPOs where candidates are selected randomly or based on how attractive they are.

2 & 3. Friends almost never help in this regard. Unless they're college friends who care about you selflessly. Direct applications to partners are also a hit and miss unless the partner is from the same college as you. Even that, increases chances only by a bit.

3. Recruiters remain the best option for lateral hiring, by far.

NCDRC is one of the worst tribunals. The bench gets pressured by Senior Advocates, the presiding judges are technical members who do not know the law at all, and mostly adjournments are sought and long dates are given. I always have a feeling of unease whenever I am there. You could probably offer to assist with writing judgments, do research etc.

I'm an intern at NCDRC currently and need advice as to how can I make the most out of it. Currently I'm usually just sitting in the back of the courtrooms and observing how the advocates argue and how the judges respond. I'd appreciate new, creative perspectives to look at courtroom dynamics, and any other thing I can do while interning. I've tried talking to other interns, but they've just formed their groups with the same-year mates and don't really look encouraged enough to interact with others.

As someone who wanted to get into academia from the start, got in and now completely regret it. I wish I aimed for law firms or even litigation. Now I don't have work experience, internships are more than a decade old and have no connection to side step. Trapped can't leave. I advise everyone to not join, even if it's a tier 1 institutions. Central university won't happen without deep connections.

Yaar ideology and education have no relationship with each other. If you want to know whether it will provide a good education, check who on the website has experience with education and mentoring. Ask yourself how much time and energy someone with a lucrative practice will put into students who can't take their fees back, as opposed to clients who pay per hour. Then do the math with whatever ideology you want. 2+2 will still be 4. Left liberal or not, career professors have different skills and priorities than career lawyers. Your friend can go apprentice with lawyers to learn from them.

The Supreme Court gave the verdict while adjudicating a case pertaining to a recruitment process conducted by the Rajasthan High Court, which had framed a rule stating that reserved category candidates would not be appointed to General category seats even if they scored higher than the General cut-off.

The High Court had argued that allowing SC/ST/OBC/EWS candidates to occupy General seats would amount to giving them “double benefit" — one through reservation and another through selection in the General category. The Supreme Court rejected this argument and a bench comprising Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Augustine G. Masih dismissed the Rajasthan High Court’s petition, emphasising that merit must be given due weight.

https://www.news18.com/india/sc-st-obc-candidates-eligible-for-general-seats-in-govt-jobs-if-they-clear-cut-off-rules-sc-ws-kl-9809683.html

Same principle is followed in CLAT for decades. If an SC/ST/OBC scores enough to make it to the merit list, he or she is shifted to the merit list and removed from the reserved list. The reserved list then admits another SC/ST/OBC candidate. So basically an extra SC/ST/OBC candidate makes it and the number of people in the general category decreases by 1.