NLSIU Bangalore’s Student Bar Association (SBA) has released a statement to express its wishes in the ongoing vice chancellor (VC) selection process.
NLSIU’s Executive Council (EC) is set to meet tomorrow to decide on Prof Venkata Rao’s successor as VC of India’s oldest national law school.
The students have stated they would like their next VC to be, amongst other factors:
- “well-versed with contemporary international perspectives on legal education”, which would help to attract “motivated and competent faculty members” and leverage its strong alumni network.
- the new VC should have a strong focus on research, the state of which at NLSIU was currently fairly dire.
The said they’d hope a VC who met those metrics would ensure the law school would avoid complacency causing it to lose the earned “prestigious status of being known as India’s best law school” (as backed up by National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) rankings prepared by the government).
Full students’ letter below:
We are releasing this statement on behalf of the Student Community at the National Law School of India University (NLSIU), Bangalore. We feel that it is our obligation to express the collective concerns of present students at this point of time since the Executive Council (EC) of NLSIU is scheduled to meet on July 6, 2019 in order to discuss the appointment of the new Vice-Chancellor. We hope that the Hon’ble members representing the Higher Judiciary, Bar Council of India, Bar Council of Karnataka, Government of Karnataka, the NLSIU Faculty and other stakeholders will carefully consider the views expressed below.
We would like to briefly state our aspirations for the future of NLSIU. While our institution has earned the prestigious status of being known as India’s best law school, it is important for us not to become complacent. It is vital to keep pace with reforms undertaken in the legal education sector at a global level so as to emerge as an internationally recognised centre of academic excellence. In order to pursue this goal, we hope that the new Vice Chancellor will be well-versed with contemporary international perspectives on legal education, especially through personal teaching experience and research engagements. These attributes will help in mitigating the difficulties faced by the institution in recent years, especially when it comes to (i) shaping an institutional environment that is conducive for producing high-quality research and (ii) attracting motivated and competent faculty members. Apart from these two core academic functions, the new Vice-Chancellor should be in a position (iii) to leverage the institution’s strong alumni network while also carrying forward its liberal campus culture in addressing the day-to-day problems and anxieties of students. We have attempted to elaborate upon these concerns in the following paragraphs.
(I) Cultivating High-Quality Research
The National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) published by the Union Ministry of Human Resource Development (HRD) has consistently recognized NLSIU as the best law school in India, after accounting for the relevant criteria in an aggregative manner. However, in the most recently published rankings, NLSIU was ranked Eighth (8th) among Indian Law Schools in the category of ‘Research Productivity & Impact (RPI) with 0 faculty citations and less than 5 research-based publications. None of these publications have appeared in internationally recognised peer-reviewed journals, such as those which are part of the SCOPUS or the ‘Web of Science’ lists. This is the unfortunate reality at a time when several other Indian Law Schools are reporting a much better output on this count. Hence, there is an urgent need for an institutional leader who has first-hand experience in designing and delivering credible research outcomes. The objectives should be to encourage faculty members, research scholars and advanced students to publish articles in internationally recognized peer-reviewed journals apart from contributing chapters and essays to books brought out by the most credible academic and professional publishing houses in the world. This requires many steps, such as attracting external funding for longitudinal research projects, putting into place rigorous processes for research supervision, the frequent hosting of seminars and workshops to enable deeper scholarly discussions as well as constant interactions with practitioners and policy-makers.
The Vice-Chancellor should be able to lead by personal example when it comes to promoting a culture of participating in scholarly discussions and producing thoroughly crafted published writing. This can indeed be done by creating suitable incentives and assessment policies for the teachers and students respectively. The existing Research Centres and Extension Activities at NLSIU need to expand their output and impact by closely involving students enrolled in the taught programmes. It was in recognition of the close relationship between public policy and law that NLSIU launched the Master of Public Policy (MPP) programme in 2014. Thus, the new Vice-Chancellor should have experience with research and networking in both of these fields.
(II) Attracting and Retaining Competent Faculty Members
NLSIU needs to initiate the transition from domestic competition to global excellence, where the traditional pedagogy accounts for the best practices evolved elsewhere. Currently, there are no International faculty members at NLSIU, and only a few of its Professors have acquired the credentials or reputation to be invited to teach at Foreign Universities. The QS World University Rankings, on the lines of other global indexes, values ‘International Faculty Ratio’ and ‘Citations per Faculty’ at a combined 25%. NLSIU fares poorly on both counts. As explained earlier, in order to compete globally, NLSIU needs to satisfy international research standards, which can only be achieved if there is a sizeable pool of faculty members with cross-country experience in teaching, research and clinical education. Thus, the institution requires a Vice-Chancellor who has already demonstrated the ability to recruit faculty members with qualifications from the best known Universities in the world. It would be even more desirable if the individual chosen for this position personally possesses such credentials and is hence closely clued in to transnational academic networks.
The prompt hiring of competent and motivated faculty members is particularly important during the present academic year (2019-2020). At present, NLSIU has only 13 teachers in permanent positions out of the 47 teachers who are delivering courses for the B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) and LL.M. students. A majority of teachers are engaged in temporary positions through annual contracts that can be terminated without assignment of reasons. They have been given different designations such as ‘Ad-Hoc’, ‘Visiting’ and ‘Adjunct’ Professors. While some Senior Professors are continuing with teaching in these roles after their formal retirement (from NLSIU and other Universities), there are as many as 17 relatively younger teachers who are engaged in ‘Ad-Hoc’ positions. Some of them have been serving in such temporary positions for more than 6-7 years. While some of the ‘Ad-Hoc’ teachers have taught well and produced good scholarship, there are also several among them who have consistently failed to meet the student’s expectations. This has led to considerable disengagement on part of the students, even in several compulsory courses. We have arrived at this sorry situation because no teachers have been recruited to permanent positions over the last decade. We fear that if a formal process of recruitment to permanent positions is not conducted soon, NLSIU risks losing the more competent teachers among the pool of ‘Ad-hoc’ faculty. It goes without saying that the present situation where more than 70% of the teachers are in temporary positions also amounts to neglecting the applicable norms laid down by the University Grants Commission (UGC). Hence, there will be a dual onus on the new Vice-Chancellor to attract the best teaching talent that is available from other institutions while also ensuring the retention of the better performing ‘ad-hoc’ faculty members by giving them proper service conditions.
(III) Leveraging Alumni Networks and Engagement with Students
The biggest asset of any educational institution are its students, and in the longer-run its alumni. NLSIU is fortunate to have a close-knit alumni network, with many graduates having distinguished themselves in their respective lines of work. Their mentorship and support towards current students needs to be deepened through structured programmes. To facilitate continuing and meaningful alumni participation in matters such as curriculum reform, skills training, instituting scholarships for students in need and providing assistance with employment opportunities, the new Vice-Chancellor must enjoy close proximity with and have great credibility within the NLSIU alumni community.
At the center of NLSIU’s achievements over the last three decades is its liberal ethos- an across-the-board platform it provides to students to express their opinions and voice their concerns, and the liberty granted to students without constant moral policing. Unarguably, it is this liberty that has contributed to students of NLSIU becoming more involved and free-thinking members of a community. The liberal ethos is best reflected by greater student awareness and participation in addressing issues like Mental Health and Sexual Harassment, made possible by the empathy demonstrated by the administration. In wake of the #MeToo movement, it is integral for the new VC to lead and support the strive towards a gender equal and harassment free campus. The VC should be intolerant towards any identity based discrimination and work towards strengthening the rules and systems prohibiting the same on campus. Thus, the liberal fabric of the NLSIU community must be promoted by the new VC whilst also demonstrating empathy on requisite issues concerning the student body.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
In any case, equality of outcomes is absurd in any ranking. Relative weightage is a legitimate statistical tool, and rightly so. Law School reality - doesn't matter that MPP Pillai never published, he was a damn good corporate law teacher [at least till his final years, from what I hear].
- Placements: At par (but let me be generous and place NSLIU slightly ahead)
- Faculty quality: NLUD and NALSAR waaaay ahead
- Research and publications: NLUD and NALSAR waaaay ahead
- Infrastructure: NLUD and NALSAR waaaay ahead
Thus, overall, NLUD and NALSAR are ahead.
QED.
Law School still attracts overwhelming majority of top rankers (which naturally means avg quality is better). Please don't reposnd with CLAT rank isn't everything - I know that. But it's indicative. And in any case, no way can NALSAR (which gets 60-120 ranks) be better than law school. Of course, exceptional people will be there everywhere - a top NALSAR grad will probably outstrip a middling Law School grad. But compare rank for rank, NLS will still top out. As for NLUD, remove the top 10 (roughly) from any batch, and the rest do not hold a candle to the average from law school, NALSAR, NUJS etc.
The law of averages still helps, in addition to the fact that top 10 at law school are still well ahead of the pack - toppers from other law school can compete yes, might beat as well. But top 10 averages would still hold law school ahead. This isn't because of much else, other than the fact that potentially better people come to law school (due to preference), and the general student-first approach to everything (co-curriculars, academics etc) rather than admin spoon feeding (at NLUD, let's all be honest) builds a more resilient capable talent pool.
I go for Day Zero recruitment every year and this is clear. We pick NALSAR/NUJS top 15 over someone from Law School (say rank 45), but otherwise, pound for pound, law school is the better bet. And I hear similar things from across firms (and my wife, a NALSAR grad concurs). But bottom feeders at NLS, don't think you can coast. I'd rather go down to NLIU or GNLU and pick top 5 than you. Trust me, there aren't enough jobs around that we are compelled to pick you.
Sudhir is NOT A CERTAINTY. I would say 50-50 shot that he makes it.
www.thenewsminute.com/article/hyd-law-student-files-police-complaint-dean-hostel-eviction-after-me-too-post-90660
www.edexlive.com/campus/2018/nov/01/after-being-evicted-for-sexual-harassment-complaints-against-prof-symbiosis-law-students-shocked-by-4327.html
1 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arjan Kumar Sikri, Judge, Supreme Court of India: Sudhir
2 Hon'ble Mr.Justice U U Lalit, Judge, Supreme Court of India: Sudhir
3 Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Judge, Supreme Court of India: Sudhir
4 Hon'ble Dr. Justice Shivaraj V Patil, Former Judge, Supreme Court of India: Sudhir
5 Shri. Manan Kumar Mishra, Senior Advocate, Chairman, Bar Council of India: Gurpur
6 Shri. Debi Prasad Dhal, Advocate, Co-Chairman, Bar Council of India: Gurpur
7 Shri. Vijay Bhatt, Advocate, Managing Trustee, Bar Council of India Trust: Gurpur
8 Shri. Apurba Kumar Sharma, Senior Advocate, Chairman, Executive Committee, Bar Council of India: Gurpur
9 Shri. Pratap Mehta , Advocate, Associate Managing Trustee, Bar Council of India: Gurpur
10 Shri. Y. R. Sadasiva Reddy , Member, Bar Council of India: Gurpur
11 Shri. Uday Holla, Advocate General, Karnataka: Sudhir
12 Dr.N Nagambika Devi, IAS , Principal Secretary to Government of Karnataka, Higher Education: Sudhir
13 Shri. N.C. Srinivasa , Law Secretary, Government of Karnataka: Sudhir
14 Prof. (Dr.) R. Venkata Rao, Vice Chancellor, NLSIU: No vote
15 Prof. (Dr.) V.S. Elizabeth Professor of History, NLSIU: Rao
16 Prof. (Dr.) O.V. Nandimath, Professor of Law & Registrar, NLSIU: Rao
17 Prof. (Dr.) Ashok R. Patil , Professor of Law, NLSIU : Rao
18. Dr.Nagarathna A , Associate Professor, NLSIU : Rao
Votes for Sudhir: 7
Votes for Gurpur: 6
Rao: 4
And different names:
Hon'ble Mr.Justice U U Lalit
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
(Special Invitee)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer
(Special Invitee)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta
(Special Invitee)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice V Gopala Gowda
Shri. Manan Kumar Mishra
Shri. Debi Prasad Dhal
Shri. Vijay Bhatt
Shri. Apurba Kumar Sharma
Shri.Dinesh Pathak
Shri. Y. R. Sadasiva Reddy
Shri.K B Naik
Shri B H Anil Kumar, IAS
Shri. S B Vastramath
Prof. (Dr.) R. Venkata Rao
Prof. (Dr.) V.S. Elizabeth
Prof. (Dr.)O.V. Nandimath
Prof. (Dr.) Ashok R. Patil
Dr. Nagarathna A
No idea how this is going to work, because to the best of my knowledge, Rao (NLUO VC) is likelier to get BCI backing (Manan Mishra is from Odisha), than Gurpur. Further, is it really going to be a Night's Watch style election? I think there would be a discussion (where the SC judges might be able to set the tenor) rather than force a vote. And in that case, highly doubt BCI guys opposing SC judges (if they favour Sudhir to begin with, that is).
Having been taught by Nagarathana, and Patil, I can't imagine them opposing Sudhir (if the SC judges make their preference clear). But who knows, maybe Nandi will go hammer and tonks at it to avoid Sudhir and settle for the devils he knows.
- Prof Anup Surendranath, NLUD (NLSIU alum)
- Prof Aparna Chandra, NLUD (NLSIU alum)
- Prof Mrinal Satish, NLUD (NLSIU alum)
- Prof Chinamyi Arun, NLUD (NALSAR alum)
- Prof Siddharth Chauhan, NALSAR (NLSIU alum)
Others are free to add more names from the top 3 (NLSIU, NALSAR, NLUD).
And isn't Anup Surendranath from NALSAR?
- We are looking at alumni of the top 3 NLUs teaching in the top 3 NLUs
- only alumni with foreign degrees are being considered so that they can compare their experiences in India and abroad
- guest lecturers are not counted.
Foreign degrees are at the most one of the pointers to be considered. Most of the foreign universities will give you an LLM degree these days if you can pay their fees. That doesn't make you a good teacher nor a good researcher. In any case, some of the people mentioned re NUJS have such degrees too. And having met them and knowing every other person whom you mentioned and most other faculty at NLSIU, NALSAR and NLUD personally, I can assure that at least 5 of the 7 can compete with any faculty that any NLU has at present in terms of capability.
Only 2 of the 7 mentioned are actually contractual people. They too have the same workload as permanent ones, so aside from your senseless and unqualified prejudice, they are equally capable of contributing to the study.
Finally, your only qualification is being an anon troll. With that, don't try offering baseless criticism against people who are actually doing good work and don't believe yourself capable of judging them. Your lack of research skills is also evident from trying to pass off teachers who no longer teach to belong to an institution.
Once again, for the benefit of people who clearly have a difficulty in simple written English, only 3 of the 7 "professors" at NUJS should be allowed to continue teaching. Ironically none of those 3 are NUJS alumni.
@NLUD troll - Everyone knows how many NLU grad faculty you actually have, how many have left, or are in the process of leaving. It is a small world and people talk. So please can you give it a rest and let us think about the legal education scene as a whole?
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first