HPNLU Shimla students returned to classes today after 10 days of protests and yesterday’s appearance of the university chancellor, who took note of their concerns and assured them things would improve.
However, the chancellor and Himachal Pradesh chief justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary stopped short of making guarantees in writing to students, which had been one of the central demands of students who had been engaged with dialogue with the administration for more than a week.
“Today we have attended all the classes and protest had been called off after appearance of chancellor,” one student told us today, on condition of anonymity. “Most certainly we have to accept this outcome because we have no recourse after appearance of chancellor.
“This is the last resort we have exhausted. we have to be happy that chancellor came.”
That said, it seems that the protests and issues students were facing had managed to focus the attention of the administration, as well as that of Chaudhary, who attended campus at around 5pm yesterday with fellow high court judge Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan and a member of the state bar council.
According to vice chancellor Prof Nishtha Jaswal and a student source, the following issues would be some of the issues that would be settled:
- Students would be allowed to start a student bar association. Jaswal said that students would be making a proposal that would be considered by the executive council, which could then decide whether and how to amend the college regulations.
- The internet connection contracted to Reliance Jio would hopefully be operational in the next week.
- The old mess contract had been terminated and would be re-tendered to a new contractor, with student involvement in the process and formulation of the menu. Students were also invited to start a cooperative mess, where they would be responsible for management and the contracts, said Jaswal; however, the student source we spoke to said that students were realistically not currently in a position to run the mess.
- Library timings would and curfews would be extended to 9pm with transportation back to hostels available, said Jaswal, if students took “the responsibility”. But she added that the judges did not agree that female students could have a curfew that was as late, due to certain late-night security risks with the location of and lighting around the girl’s hostels, being based in a “panther-prone” area.
- Lighting on campus would be improved, though it was partly in the hands of the wider university which is hosted part of HPNLU at present.
Jaswal said that limited funding by the state government remained a problem, but that she and students would be looking at solutions, particularly when the next chancellor would take over in October.
“Let us follow the proper code. We need not to distrust the government in toto, we will try to interact,” she said.
One option she was also considering was to seek corporate social responsibility (CSR) funding from companies, such as ones involved in construction on campus.
Photo by Bjorn Christian Torissen.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
While things remain hot, we should get the following things done:
1. Quickly get the administration to update basic RTI details on the university administration - PIO and FAA details; RTI application details; ensure that RTI fees can be paid through a variety oo f instruments and not just through postal orders and DD; to whom should the RTI fees be addressed etc
2. All EC, FC, AC meetings are already in electronic format. The university must have all the minutes and agenda notes handed over to the student representatives and also uploaded on the university website. Check the following links
thewire.in/law/uncloaking-the-rule-of-opacity-in-national-law-universities
www.legallyindia.com/lawschools/nujs-students-win-access-to-1-8gb-of-long-hidden-admin-meeting-minutes-from-madhava-menon-times-to-date-nearly-20190218-9895
sja.nujs.edu/rti
3. Start filing RTI applications. Maybe even contact this person thewire.in/law/uncloaking-the-rule-of-opacity-in-national-law-universities or RGNUL students barandbench.com/rgnul-protests-ao-sp-singh-resgination-rti/
4. Quickly get in touch with student body representatives of other NLUs - those who have established student associations and also those who are in various stages of formation - so that we know what kinds of tricks the administration uses to frustrate student bodies. One thing is clear that we should never allow faculty or VC to nominate etc. At best they should be in purely advisory capacity with no requirement to secure their concurrence etc
5. The student body must definitely have its own independent website. For now we should widely and clearly publicize on FB, Twitter etc who to contact among student representatives.
6. Many NLUs have gone through similar birth pangs and some came out okay. Some are still struggling. And some are collapsing. Instead of waiting, we should seek out more info to connect to the wider NLU community of students and alumni to find out what works and what doesn't.
7. The INI or central funding is a closed chapter. CSR funding very doubtful and will likely be peanuts. State is the most likely and obvious donor. But the more it funds the greater control it will seek and operate through VCs such as the one we have.
Before we talk of "more" funds, we should check how have the available funds been used thus far. Again that takes us back to access to minutes, agenda notes of EC, FC, AC and other university documents such as Annual Reports, Audit reports, Income and Expenditure reports etc. We definitely need those. Since our fees literally finances the operational costs of the university, we should definitely have access to such documents
8. Does the university have proper rules and regulations in place for basic things such as - Works, Procurement, Maintenance of Store, Tender, Contracting, Outsourcing, Construction, faculty recruitment, choosing auditors and other vendors, finance and accounts etc? Each of these have major financial implications and hotbeds for leakage, wastage, corruption, favouritism etc. We should definitely get copies of such rules.
A lollipop called consideration of "student body" has been offered. We will now falsely assume that it is a "big concession" and silver bullet for all our problems. Actually many students were relieved with the face saver because things were going nowhere. Was the VC and Registrar even rapped by the eminent worthies for their actions and omissions thus far?
If the state government is the main villain and the funder then why don't we have any written assurances from them? At least with RGNUL the mediators signed off on the agreed points. Do we have such a document? Just a statement from an amorphous student body. It shows that we have zero leverage and NJ and others will continue with impunity.
Since one of the agreed points was on the issue of transparency and our right to access to documents concerning how the administration works, expends money (especially our fees) and takes decisions, let's do a test.
Can our student worthies who organised this protest (I am not being sarcastic; I trusted you all but never expected such a climb down) ensure that the university gives RTI details and even files relevant applications? It doesn't take long to mention the names of PIO and application process.
Forget a roar, I doubt the concerned students will even meow to this suggestion. And that's why we are doomed.
From NLU Ranchi and NUJS stories it is clear that when state government and HC come together, student efforts can be frustrated. But they do not always win as in the case of HNLU Raipur. Maybe the fact that the state was going into elections and a change in government helped them.
Irrespective of the results of the students protests mentioned above, a common strand stands out. Unity and collective intelligence of the student community. This was always our fight. Other NLU student bodies could at best extend solidarity statements. Even if all the NLUs issued such statements how could it have tangibly helped against NJ and Co. who have been carrying out this mess with impunity (and will continue with further vigour).
The VC and Registrar had us successfully branded as a group of entitled, petulant, wayward set of youngsters who do not like "strict administration".
NLS students managed to get a VC of their choice. And now this -
www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/bar-council-of-india-chairman-urges-nlsiu-students-to-limit-protests/article29549457.ece (even the BCI had to surrender)
www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/national-law-school-varsity-registrar-resigns-from-post/article29546269.ece
Is my suggestion that we push NJ and Co to come good (quickly) on their promise of transparency? We finance their salaries and perks that they never forget to take every month. Therefore they don't get to decide the breadth and depth of transparency. We decide that. And we need to know everything.
We could have always made our bark worse than a bite. Will our "student leaders" now show some spine and demand transparency?
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first