[advertisement]
 

LegallyIndia.com

Weekly newsletter



| Share

Create an account  |  Forgot your password?
Home

Lawyers Collective overturns anti-gay law

Print

rainbowflag_thThe Lawyers Collective has emerged victorious in its bid to decriminalise homosexuality by overturning the so-called Section 377 law in the Delhi High Court this morning.

The sexual health group Naz Foundation brought the public interest litigation, in which it was represented by the Lawyers Collective non-governmental organisation (NGO).

Senior advocate Anand Grover led the Naz Foundation legal team as director of the Lawyers Collective's HIV/AIDS unit.

He told Legally India: "It's a historic decision primarily because India was the first country where the British introduced this law [Section 377], which was being used to criminalise adult sexual relations and also interfered with the health services."

Grover was assisted by Lawyers Collective advocates Trideep Pais, Shivangi Rai, Mehak Sothi and Tripti Tandon.

The judgement is not binding outside Delhi and Grover admitted that the possibility of a Supreme Court appeal by the Government still existed. But he added: "We are ready for either outcome but we hope that the basis of judgement is strong. We'll see how the government takes it."

Outgoing Assistant Solicitor General P.P. Malhotra appeared for the respondents, the Union of India, the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare.

The Ministry of Home Affairs argued that decriminalising "homosexual   conduct  might open floodgates of delinquent behaviour", which was rejected by the Court.

The writ was first brought before the Delhi High Court in 2004 but was then dismissed because the Naz Foundation lacked standing to take the case forward.

The organisation brought the case again on the grounds that Section 377 interfered with its mission to provide HIV/AIDS education and prevention services.

Section 377 was introduced into the 1861 Indian Penal Code by the British, which criminalised "carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal" with a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

The arguments in the present case revolved around the definition of "carnal intercourse against the order of nature", challenges under Indian constitutional human rights and that Section 377 was abused by the police to harass the gay community.

The Court ruled in favour of the Naz Foundation today by finding that Section 377 contravened articles 21, 14 and 15 of India's constitution, which respectively protect the right to life and personal liberty, equality before law and prohibit discrimination.

The Delhi High Court decided that Section 377 does not apply to any consensual sex between adults.

Click here to download the full judgement.

The Lawyers Collective is an Indian national NGO that employs lawyers who deal with women's rights, HIV/AIDS and civil rights.

Read our interview with The Lawyers Collective Anand Grover about the long road to getting section 377 overturned.

Comments (2)Add Comment
NB: The comments below are the personal views and opinions expressed by readers and are not those of Legally India. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please send us a message with your objection and contact details and we will review it as soon as practicable.
0
#1 ...
written by Aye, 03 July 2009 09:07
Kudos. Well done.
  • report abuse
  • +0
  • vote down
  • vote up
  • Does this comment add to discussion? 
0
#2 ...
written by Anon, 07 July 2009 23:45
Congratulations to all at Naz and LC. Thanks to Legally India for featuring this. Makes an interested read from the regular features about commercial law firms.
  • report abuse
  • +0
  • vote down
  • vote up
  • Does this comment add to discussion? 

Write comment
smaller | bigger

busy
 

Create an account  |  Forgot your password?

Twitter feed

Anything for an adjournment! Hearing in Ruchika case adjourned after attack on Rathore http://bit.ly/9cMCud RT @MumbaiCentral
Australia is hot! After Norton Rose, Allen & Overy now to set up shop in Oz, gutting Clayton Utz http://is.gd/7VmTk
And here's the current list of #IndianLawyers on Twitter: http://is.gd/7KgO4 Know more? Add them: http://is.gd/7K136 RT @gkjohn
Eversheds India head Gauri Advani arranged 'bribe' to state official in 2002, says UK High Court http://is.gd/7Gcvv

week in focus

Where is the love? / Issue 34
article thumbnailThis week J Sagar Associates (JSA) partner Nishith Dhruva left the firm to set up his own practice. And on good...
For future issues:



Latest features

Are female Indian lawyers outpacing Western colleagues?
article thumbnail"Law was often looked at as a marriage degree - three years in law, then you get married," recalls AZB founding partner Zia Mody about women's views of a legal...

Latest Comments

Attempting Marriages the ROFR Way
hey u 'll pay for this popat..... [kidding]... hope u keep urself busy wid this ...
Does law student suicide question whether lawyers ...
i really can't comment about others but thankfully ragging is not an issue in na...
Symbi into top 10 as US mooters sweeps Indian team...
Nice post!
PROVINCE OF LIFE DETERMINED
Are you a poet or a philosopher? What is a poet: A philosopher whose words rhyme...
Attempting Marriages the ROFR Way
By the same logic - your mom named you legalpopat?
Careers Counsel: How do I write the best law firm ...
I have noticed that people tend to use single letters in place of full words at ...
'Illegality' charges derail Delhi Bar Council exec...
Good Start!
The Calcutta High Court website
yes its true and very sad indeed ... I, being from kolkata, m aware of this prob...
Attempting Marriages the ROFR Way
Which law school did you qualify from? And where did you get trained?
Opinion: Collective's wisdom; Should foreign firms...
This article is the clinching argument for allowing foreign law firms - that we ...

Email us now


Online Lawyers

9 users and 1400 guests online

Latest forum posts

More posts...