We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
A. โฎโฎโฎ
B. โฎโฎโฎ
C. Gshanks already said no to ASG a year ago - you think he will wait 5 years for that all over again.?
https://x.com/adishcaggarwala/status/1826978819850313980
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jyg-nSQPtrQ
https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/congress-adhir-choudhary-kapil-sibal-withdraw-kolkata-rape-murder-rg-kar-supreme-court-west-bengal-2586622-2024-08-23
https://www.verdictum.in/news/rg-kar-medical-college-and-hospital-rape-west-bengal-police-kapil-sibal-conflict-of-interest-supreme-court-bar-association-1549077
https://lawbeat.in/top-stories/SCBA-concern-Kapil-Sibal-resolution-personal-views
https://indialegallive.com/constitutional-law-news/courts-news/kolkata-doctor-rape-murder-case-scba-executive-committee-objects-to-resolution-signed-by-kapil-sibal/#google_vignette
To give everyone the background to this:
- As was mentioned in another LI thread, it is widely believed that AMS-GShanks was the first choice of the WB govt, but both allegedly withdrew fearing that they would become unpopular for taking up this case. In AMS's case, he is not indebted to Mamata anymore, because he is no longer a TMC-supported RS member from Bengal. He will be joining from Telangana now.
- Had AMS taken up this case, it may also have caused anger within the Congress, as RaGa himself has criticised the TMC government. Remember also that AMS could be a candidate for the Attorney General's post if the Congress wins in 2029, and GShanks for the ASG's post. So why should they wade into this mess and risk their reputation?
- In contrast, Kapil Sibal is no longer with the Congress. He has left in exchange for being a Samajwadi-supported RS candidate. And he doesn't give a damn about being popular or unpopular among the public. He is SCBA Prez and an RS MP, plus earns crores in fees. So why bother?
- Meanwhile, it's unlikely that MG will face similar calls to withdraw, given that she has a mere secondary role and hasn't even spoken a full sentence at the hearing. It's quite possible that MG could have been recommended to the WB govt by GShanks, as a fellow NLSIU alum. A lot of people are heartbroken at MG taking up this case and are ranting online, but these are mostly Gen Z fanboys/fangirls with zero clout. The fact is that MG has the full backing of the NLSIU community and that is all that matters.
- Finally, the legal media's coverage to the Adish Agarwala-led backlash is interesting. LiveLaw openly campaigned for Sibal during the SCBA election and has blacked out the news so far. BB as well. Only RW legal outlets like LawBeat and Verdictum have covered it so far. But all eyes on Adish Agarwala to see how far he can take this and whether his conflict of interest claim will snowball into a wider protest against Sibal, backed by the BJP.