We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
1. Your committee feels it right
2. The external examiner feels right
3. You have incorporated changes suggested by externals/committee/other people in your PhD presentations.
The issue arises at all of the 3 stages. Also because the NLS didn't systematized the program. Now, it's a little more systematic and Prof. Arun is being strict towards people who haven't submitted their thesis. Many have been asked to finish it during the year or say tata bye bye.
Some people's thesis has also been languishing with external faculties. So, that's an issue university needs to solve.
A PhD is already a very long arduous process and imagine 3-6 years of hardwork being kept in a standstill is frightening.
If anyone has any knowledge about this, can they confirm whether it's worth it to still try for NLS ? Please do not suggest a foreign PhD, i do not have the finances necessary.