We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
If you admit that the allegations are not true, who tf are u to make claims on a public platform and defame the ex judges? Ayodhya was decided on merits, don't politicize everything. If you find it wrong, file a review petition. Don't sit on ur bed and write shit on these platforms
He made a lot of statements about diversity and feminism and what not, but he hasn't elevated a single female to SC, 2 of his appointments are products of nepotism.
He keeps giving oral observations about liberty and rights and all that but they are limited to oral remarks and are not reflected in judgements.
He will form a bench knowing fully well that they will decide against gay marriage and then give a dissenting judgement.
Same thing was done by UU Lalit in EWS case, but atleast lalit didn't go around acting like a messiah and giving stupid speeches.
His courts have time to hear stupid PILs about removing senior advocate system, removing E=MC² and theory of evolution from school syllabus, but they can't spare enough time to hear and decide umar Khalid's bail plea, he has been In jail for years now.
Don't be mistaken, chandrchud is playing the same role as congress did in 1890s, he does lip service so liberals don't join the movement for increasing demand of accountability from judiciary, especially with regards to appointments.
A man like gogoi or Arun mishra is still better than Chandrchud, because you can depend on them to do what they say, meanwhile chandu is just a wolf in sheep's clothing.
- A rant
SC should had atleast recognize the same couple relation so that might have paved the way to make legislation