Gopal Sankaranarayanan. He was given 30 minutes but finally they gave him 2 hours - he covered about 30 different points which hadn't been covered before, even though he volunteered to go last. And even the judges praised the amount of work put in. Nobody else got that praise.
Let's conduct a poll to determine who has presented the most persuasive argument against the abrogation. When casting your vote, please consider the following criteria:
- Coherence - Adherence to first principles - Structural integrity - Clarity of thought - Elocutionary prowess
Current and former juniors, co-counsels, opposing counsels, and all instructing counsels related to this case are welcome to participate. If there's a potential conflict of interest, please annotate your vote with the term “Conflicted.” There's no obligation to disclose your identity.
- Coherence
- Adherence to first principles
- Structural integrity
- Clarity of thought
- Elocutionary prowess
Current and former juniors, co-counsels, opposing counsels, and all instructing counsels related to this case are welcome to participate. If there's a potential conflict of interest, please annotate your vote with the term “Conflicted.” There's no obligation to disclose your identity.