Not plagiarised but it seeems that there were disagreements within the faculty too. Basically the students convened a general body meeting which dissolved all committees. So there is no functioning Moot Court Society. So admin got a chance to take over, to “encourage more participation”. One of the faculty advisors argued that encouraging participation is fine but the univ rounds also should have a clear standard in terms of depth; participation can be encouraged through novice moots, making moots as part of continuing evaluations etc also. That faculty advisor also had a detailed problem ready but that was not accepted by the admin. So now it is a question of whether a single-issue problem with at least basic materials easily accessible (including some not-great memorials) can have sufficient depth. And whether the admin should be running this at all instead of the student body.