We want LI to be one of the friendliest places on the internet, where lawyers and law students help each other with their career related queries and occasionally discuss other stuff that might affect their lives too. In other words:
1. Be kind, respectful and helpful to each other.
2. Be bona fide, truthful, genuine and curious.
3. Assume the best intention of others.
Therefore, in using the site, you must agree to do your best to uphold these community guidelines.
Note that what you find here is written and moderated by anonymous people on the internet.
Therefore everything you read here is very likely unverified, rumour, speculation and/or downright false.
In continuing to read anything here, you must therefore agree not to take anything you read here as factual and that you will exercise due caution, diligence and common sense before acting on any information you may come across here.
You also agree to report any inaccurate or malicious comments with the buttons. Moderators take action within 24 hours, as required and appropriate under law.
Our full terms and conditions apply too.
Do you solemnly agree to all of the above?
Truly NLS level placement statistics, except for the fact that twice as many people say for placements at NLUJ, but who cares. Please don’t call out the RICC xoxo
▮▮▮
Go to a college where deserving people get jobs.
Am happy to be corrected if someone can provide concrete evidence to refute it.
What matters is the knowledge you demonstrate in your interview and your ability to be humble and learn. An student with good Tier 2 internships who has a good grasp of the basics can get hired over someone with just cursory Tier 1 experience .The value of marks depend on the quality of questions and the syllabus.
Again it's not your fault, the hype given to "toppers" during law school ensure most become complacent thinking academia will impress potential recruiters. This is a misconceived notion. Please introspect and all the best! )
Is the RICC actually going to put ▮▮▮ whenever they decide to come to the campus, with stuff like they postponed their day 0 because of them?
Do you all not know that the HRs also coordinate amongst themselves about placements? And if so, then please for the love of God, stop spreading lies and rumors.
Just please stop. It's sickening.
You have single handedly reduced our college to the level of a tier 2 college. Shame!
I am sure they would be so proud of themselves after ruining their very own day zero.
Maybe people who mugg up stuff for ▮▮▮ years is not something firms are looking for?
Maybe firms are looking for people with soft skills too?
Maybe develop that rather than cribbing about it here?
Why did they all of a sudden go ahead with the decision? Any idea?
The RICC members and their affiliates are now discussing this thread on the batch group and are asking everyone to report the comments as it portrays them negatively.
“Guys, we all (as a batch) should report these comments put there. If all of us do, it will definitely be taken down.”
What is this? Communist Party of China? You can’t suppress the truth. Mod please be aware of such false alarms. They ruined our placements and now they want to perpetuate this toxic culture by not letting anyone know about their misgiving.
It would have been easily anticipated looking at the PPOs the class of 2024 received and should have strategised accordingly. Looking at the hiring freeze and the overall recruitment climate it would have been a prudent move to schedule Day-Z post NLS and should have approached alternate firms.