Speaking as someone who recruits from the place, you are way overthinking this entire issue. The recruiter is not really going to make hair-split differences between whether your CGPA is 7/10 or 6/7 or such matters. At the most, the relative batch rank will count. As for higher studies, there the percentage of marks secured matters, not CGPA, which differs widely across institutions anyway. So I would advise you to cut out the melodrama about your future being ruined, study and learn and do your best during exams and other co-curricular activities and importantly, during internships. That way, your future will remain as secure as it gets. Peace out.

1. Just to assuage your immediate concerns, this won't impact placements really because they're entirely based on batch ranks. Even without change of grading systems, there used to huge differences in average scores on different batches based on the faculty who took particular courses for a batch. For instance, while the average CGPA of the top 10 rankers in Batch of 2018 may be 6.3/7, in another batch it could be 5.5/7. Even recruiters understand this and that is why they only look at ranks during recruitments.

2. This does create problems when applying for foreign university admissions where your 10 point CGPA will be judged against thousands of applicants from other universities. For that, I suggest:

- Come with a fair formula for converting marks on the 75% scale (that professors are still using) to a 95% scale.

- This is NOT academic fraud, it is called "moderation". Every secondary and higher secondary education board in the country (including ICSE and CBSE) does it to keep marks fairly consistent across batches regardless of difficulty of question papers.

- NUJS administration itself has "moderated" marks on multiple occasions. This is done especially if many students fail in a particular subject - say CPC or Contracts.

- This moderation has usually been done by the UG Council prior to publication of results. So ask for past UG Council minutes from the academic section. If they don't give it to you, you can RTI them.

3. Expanding on the last point, I don't know what the SJA is upto these days - but these kind of non-sensical decisions by the administration would not even be accepted/implemented if it was the past SJAs. The current system is not even UGC compliant. It is just a renamed 7 pointer scale where the numbers 1-7 have been changed to 4-10. Go through UG Council minutes, UGC Regulations, ask for Academic Council meeting minutes (I believe the new SJAs do not even have access to governing body minutes- it's the most thing to understanding what goes on in the University). If required, petition the Academic Council, file a writ. These administrative decisions won't even stand the basic rule of parity if brought before the High Court. Please, please, please, for duck's sake, STAND UP MORE ASSERTIVELY FOR YOUR RIGHTS!