To be fair, CBCL always gives the most detailed feedback. IRCCL is great though.
Content wise, IndiaCorpLaw seems to follow an approach where they accept the first half decent article they get on a new update, irrespective of whether the author has something to contribute to the topic. The published articles, therefore, tend to be very dry (more often than not). IRCCL has great content.
And you think IndiaCorpLaw accepts all good articles and rejects the bad ones? The editorial process in ICL is actually very erratic. I have seen mere judgment summaries getting published on ICL. Also, they publish only a certain number of articles every month. So they can't accommodate all good articles.
That's very true. His recent one on unstamped arbitration agreements was very casually worded. There is no way a similar blog post by a student (even though of sane substantive quality) would have been published.
Both of these blogs are heavily NLU kids biased ,often publish sub standard articles written by NLU kids and reject good quality ones from other law schools
You can only prove that if you can show evidence of a post having been rejected by them and later getting accepted by a comparable or better forum. Otherwise who is to say whether it was really of good quality or not?
Indiacorp is easier to get published in that NLSBLR. NLSBLR also has a longer review process and you will see fewer student submissions. But otherwise, both are good. No idea about IRCCL.
People need to start looking at these things differently. This post is probably made by a relatively junior person, maybe a student. If so, then just to help you consider a different perspective, blogs should not be compared with each other, individual blogposts should be. One may come across an excellent piece of analysis in a blog that is a newer one, as well as generic info-heavy pieces in a blog that is older. Don't start comparing the blogs in general. If a post has got merit and has been drafted keeping in mind SEO and other factors significant for blogposts, then it would be discussed and referred by people in the industry and academia, which is the hallmark of success for a post.
Content wise, IndiaCorpLaw seems to follow an approach where they accept the first half decent article they get on a new update, irrespective of whether the author has something to contribute to the topic. The published articles, therefore, tend to be very dry (more often than not). IRCCL has great content.