Sometimes the content on prominent news platforms is visibly AI written and quite pointless in a way. Unclear, vague words used throughout. The usual intro, body, concl being followed for every paragraph in the story. The headline may be the only relevant line of the story and the rest is prompt generated. More prominent in daily political stories. Reflect poorly on the editors, the visble trend of AI writing is very easy to spot.
1. Should there be a general requirement on websites publishing content to declare if AI was used at any stage in generating the content for a particular story?
2. And is it legally correct for a platform or person to be taking the entire credit for AI generated content
3. Given the present trends, will news websites become irrelevant, as in the age of AI, 50-100 words pf crisp content on twitter will be better?
1. Should there be a general requirement on websites publishing content to declare if AI was used at any stage in generating the content for a particular story?
2. And is it legally correct for a platform or person to be taking the entire credit for AI generated content
3. Given the present trends, will news websites become irrelevant, as in the age of AI, 50-100 words pf crisp content on twitter will be better?