Read 6 comments as:
Filter By
Greetings, esteemed colleagues and eager beavers of law!

Did a little snooping around here (as any good lawyer does) and found this... quirk. Want to peek into a juicy comment? Too bad, rookie! Looks like we're running on a seniority system. Who designed this, King Arthur's Round Table?

Hold up before you rain down with "Quality over Quantity!" or "Wise old owls only!" - this reminds me of a story. Ever heard of the Magna Carta? Big parchment, lots of freedom talk, but mainly for the rich folks. Imagine a fresh-out-of-law-school chap back then with some brilliant ideas, but... "Shush, kiddo! The grown-ups are talking."

Isn’t it a bit like saying only Dadaji gets the remote, and we all have to watch reruns of 'C.I.D' or 'Suryavansham'... again?

And just for giggles, imagine Socrates here, labeled a 'noob'. "To question or not to question, that is... Oops! Access denied!"

Should we give this policy a second thought? Or just stock up on popcorn and wait for the juniors to start a digital uprising?

Here’s to old-timers, the young blood, and a spoonful of cheekiness!

Cheers!
Hello, seniority runs the profession, don't you know :) The seniority wall is nothing nefarious but is intended for internal discussion amongst moderators about moderation decisions, etc. If those posts were public, it would prevent open discussion about moderation decisions and would act to effectively boost trollish posts.

Hope that explains it and is acceptable :)
But sometimes we post something because we seek comments and experiences from others, which is the very purpose of posting something over here. Ends up locking out the person who initiated the thread from its comments because it was anonymously posted. Then why bother approving/moderating the comment when the discussion in itself is not open to all.
A 23-word comment posted 7 months ago was not published.
A 2-word comment posted 7 months ago was not published.
A 38-word comment posted 7 months ago was not published.