RMLNLU is the worst "Tier-2" NLU if you are looking for corporate jobs. I feel sorry for students who opt for it in place of HNLU/NLUO or even RGNUL (which did better this year, otherwise they're both same)
The placement scene is so bad that even the mass hiring year did not help the college. Just look at the sad statistics-
Bharucha- 3
LKS- 1
Wadhwa Law Chambers- 1
Trilegal- 1
Khaitan- 1
EY- 2
Even TNNLU, DSNLU, MNLU-A have better stats than this.
Although some jealous people who didn’t make it claim this but majority of rational people at LI do state about sitting for clat and retaking it. This has been the norm. So don’t listen to those jealous people.
Well there are some unusual people in LI who used to be like ‘oh we don’t wanna waste years’ but now they only champion the very cause of retaking. So maybe OP is referring to those people. Glad the perception among those people changed tho. Retaking is always a good option!
I was talking about the 2024 batch of GNLU. To the best of my knowledge, the 2024 NUJS batch also has 3 TCs. The 2025 batch I don't yet know about in full, only about 1 from GNLU and 1 from NUJS having got the VS so far.
I'll change your mind. You didn't clear AILET and are jealous of NLUD. And judging by your language and your standard of a tier-1, you don't seem to have studied at one. There, mind changed.
Lol, NLUT has never been a part of CLAT yet. But hell, by your idiotic definition, that counts. But on a serious note, drop the act, you and I both know you tanked AILET. Why lie about it? You wouldn’t have so much bitterness about NLUD if you actually got an option to study there. On the other hand, most CLAT colleges are a joke, it’s not even worth cracking for the most part.
Decent placements for one year doesn't make it a Tier-1 in "all aspects". NLIU isn't bad but there have been years where their placements have been quite poor relative to their batch size. No foreign vac schemes, barely any major international moot/ADR wins, not many scholarships (no Rhodes yet despite being the second-oldest NLU), massive domicile quota and other reservations. Tier-1 NLUs (NLS, NLUD, Nalsar, NUJS) have achievements in all these fields. Now, you even have a larger student body with some BScLLB in cybersecurity. NLIU is still a very good place compared to the tier-2s, but it's not a tier-1 except in domestic placements, maybe. The faculty and research opportunities there aren't exceptional by any means either.
When Tier 1 NLUs don't get jobs, people say look at them, they are meant for better things, be it UPSC or judiciary. When Tier 2 NLU grads actually choose the judiciary and other careers and are successful at it, people criticise them for not getting enough corp jobs. The irony of life!
Those who don't get, give the excuse later of not wanting. The sour grapes syndrome. The real good people get those and then do something else if they really want to.
9/180? What's up with the rest of the batch? Is it the dearth of corporate opportunities or plain disinterest in the corporate sector? Regardless, one really needs to ask whether this low placement number which has plagued RML for a long time comes from batch inclination towards judiciary/ UPSC or whether the Admin is just lethargic in bringing firms for recruitment.
From what I have noticed, the syllabus taught in RML is pretty UPSC-oriented while HNLU has a pretty solid syllabus that shouts corporate. This could ultimately lead to folks in either college to lean towards judiciary/Corporate. Thereby influencing placement figures.
It is a different question whether such influence would go to extent of the college placing 9 folks in corp.
Err...okay. Never heard of him in relation to the corporate academics in the country, or related scholarship, but I will take the word of a student about his teacher being good in classroom teaching. That's the best certificate possible.
By using the term "Admin" I also imply the IPC. The Admin has the responsibility of signifying their interest to such firms in getting their students placed. This is done hand-in-tie with the IPC which has the main burden of reaching out to such firms.
A low placement figure could reflect that the IPC hasn't been proactive in reaching out to firms or their alumni who are pretty well-seated in such firms. The Administration is partly liable because the very IPC is presided over and advised by the members of the faculty and other members alike.
I never stated that there exists a "Special Subject" in the syllabus that screams corporate. The overall Syllabus especially after the 5th semester including Honours and Optional Papers heavily lean towards the corporate side.
The Liberal subjects taught in RML are heavily modified to incorporate topics that are of relevance in UPSC. This has been stated by the concerned faculties themselves and is not something I'm throwing for the sake of throwing.
Lastly, I'm not sure where exactly have I mentioned anything related to faculty. There exists a mixed bunch of teachers in both colleges and I don't think either university has a deciding edge in this regard.
Once again, can you name those subjects? And merely having some random subjects means zilch if you don't have the necessary quality faculty to teach those. HNLU does not have a single decent Corp faculty.
Your logic sucks like placement stats of RML. There is no good faculty in any NLU. The alumni and connections of uni matters. Go to jgls or symbi if you want decent faculty with slutty and paid placements.
Your conclusion is apt but the question I put forward is, Why doesn't RML have that "brand name" to attract firms.
Is it because of the students themselves who aren't interested in Corp or is it the college as a whole which hasn't developed a sustaining corp culture to attract such firms.
"Brand Name" is a pretty broad term, what should be asked is, why inspite of churning out such low numbers for quite a few years, is the college not doing anything to fix it?
The Judiciary tag which one has ascribed to RML not only disincentivises firms from coming to the college but it also creates a vicious cycle where judiciary aspirants attempting CLAT believe RML is the "best" place to do it.
Does RML fund you guys? At least defend tier-1 lol.
No seriously for a change - why is this post trollish? Several nlus are also targeted but at max a contested post is placed. I think one of the mods is from RML or hnlu. Kian if you can hear us - remove the trollish tag asap. This thread is still continuing healthily.
The placement scene is so bad that even the mass hiring year did not help the college. Just look at the sad statistics-
Bharucha- 3
LKS- 1
Wadhwa Law Chambers- 1
Trilegal- 1
Khaitan- 1
EY- 2
Even TNNLU, DSNLU, MNLU-A have better stats than this.
Only T1s are NLS NALSAR and NLUD
Khaitan 1
Cam 1
Saraf 2
EY 2
TTATI 1
The admin seriously needs to do something
Confirm if you are also from DSNLU.
From what I have noticed, the syllabus taught in RML is pretty UPSC-oriented while HNLU has a pretty solid syllabus that shouts corporate. This could ultimately lead to folks in either college to lean towards judiciary/Corporate. Thereby influencing placement figures.
It is a different question whether such influence would go to extent of the college placing 9 folks in corp.
Which extra special subject is taught at HNLU that screams corporate exactly, and who are these amazing faculty who teach such subjects?
A low placement figure could reflect that the IPC hasn't been proactive in reaching out to firms or their alumni who are pretty well-seated in such firms. The Administration is partly liable because the very IPC is presided over and advised by the members of the faculty and other members alike.
I never stated that there exists a "Special Subject" in the syllabus that screams corporate. The overall Syllabus especially after the 5th semester including Honours and Optional Papers heavily lean towards the corporate side.
The Liberal subjects taught in RML are heavily modified to incorporate topics that are of relevance in UPSC. This has been stated by the concerned faculties themselves and is not something I'm throwing for the sake of throwing.
Lastly, I'm not sure where exactly have I mentioned anything related to faculty. There exists a mixed bunch of teachers in both colleges and I don't think either university has a deciding edge in this regard.
Is it because of the students themselves who aren't interested in Corp or is it the college as a whole which hasn't developed a sustaining corp culture to attract such firms.
"Brand Name" is a pretty broad term, what should be asked is, why inspite of churning out such low numbers for quite a few years, is the college not doing anything to fix it?
The Judiciary tag which one has ascribed to RML not only disincentivises firms from coming to the college but it also creates a vicious cycle where judiciary aspirants attempting CLAT believe RML is the "best" place to do it.
No seriously for a change - why is this post trollish? Several nlus are also targeted but at max a contested post is placed. I think one of the mods is from RML or hnlu. Kian if you can hear us - remove the trollish tag asap. This thread is still continuing healthily.