Remy Danton: Making lobbying look goodRemy Danton: Making lobbying look goodIndian law firms have taken a deeper interest in policy formulation in the last five years, than they did before, however they are wary in a big way of being seen as “lobbyists”, according to a research paper titled Notes from the field: How India’s corporate law firms are influencing her legal, policy and regulatory frameworks by Bhargavi Zaveri, who is an affiliated research fellow at the Harvard Law School Program on the Legal Profession.

More and more firms are styling themselves as having policy advocacy expertise, wrote Zaveri. Delhi-based start-up firm Policy Law and Regulation Chambers (PLR Chambers), for instance, started up by former Amarchand Mangaldas partner Suhaan Mukerji, was India’s first law firm positioning itself as focussing specifically on legal and public policy and “legitimate lobbying services”, as reported by Legally India in late 2013.

Amarchand, JSA, Dua Associates and Dua Consulting also maintain policy expertise wings.

Several Indian law firms have also recruited former administrators and sector regulators, for instance, in their competition law teams.

15 law firm lawyers across six big Indian law firms, who were interviewed for this study, claimed to regularly interface with the government with a view to influencing policy, and to “actively and strategically” taking up policy-related hurdles faced by their clients. They were all, however, apprehensive of being seen as “lobbyists” for their clients.

More than half of the law firms interviewed believed that the demand for policy advocacy by law firms would intensify in the immediate future, but two did not have plans to systematically build capacity in this area in the absence of a legal framework allowing lobbying in India, because not only is much policy work charged nominally or pro bono in India as the moment, but these firms also did not want to be seen as “lobbyists”.

The activities law firms undertake are varied and can often include drafting delegated legislation, according to the paper. For example, Amarchand drafted regulations laying down standards for the manufacture, storage and distribution of alcohol under the Food Safety and Standards Act 2006, regulations under the Competition Act were drafted almost entirely by law firms, and the government has also requested law firm resources in the past for administering new legal frameworks such as training officials in interpretation of newly enacted laws and strengthening enforcement mechanisms.

Most big Indian law firms are also members of industry associations such as the FICCI and the CII and are often called on to advise on implications of proposed and existing laws and frameworks, by preparing written presentations on behalf of these associations. The associations also call on “well known” partners from some of these law firms to represent their cases before ministries and regulatory authorities.

Hat-tip to Amlan Mohanty tweeting at @umlaahn for pointing us to the paper.

experts & views

Click to show 10 comments
at your own risk
(alt+shift+c)
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.
refresh Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments. Sort chronologically
1
Like +6 Object -0 BHARGAVI 13 Jun 14, 20:00  interesting
Just wanted to clarify that the paper is more about the legitimate opportunities of stakeholder interface that policymaking processes in India offer and how policymaking has become more inclusive in the last decade - and how professionals including law firms use these opportunities and contribute towards policy frameworks in India. The paper is NOT intended to sensationalize "lobbying" practices, as the headline of this article seems to convey. Thanks for covering it.
Reply Report to LI
1.1
Show?
Like +0 Object -0 kianganz 13 Jun 14, 20:02
Fair enough, thanks for your comment Bhargavi.

Have added a full stop in the headline to clarify that your paper did not ask the question whether lobbying was still a dirty word.

Best wishes,
Kian
Reply Report to LI
1.2
Like +4 Object -0 @Bhargavi 13 Jun 14, 23:21
The picture of Dent is enough to convey the sensationalism intended and image to be portrayed. No one reads the comments or the "."
Reply Report to LI
1.3
Show?
Like +1 Object -1 Incorrect 14 Jun 14, 12:46
If the reader of the article is not getting the message that you intended, I'd say that the fault lies with the person writing the article.

Not all readers will take away what you intended them to after reading the article.

Logic 101 - You can't tell people how they are supposed to perceive an article.

That should have been taken care of while writing the article.
Reply Report to LI
1.4
Show?
Like +1 Object -2 kianganz 14 Jun 14, 12:59
I don't think there's anything wrong with the article.

If none of the lawyers want to call themselves lobbyists, even though they all basically do lobbying, then a natural question for a reader to ask is why it's still seen as a dirty word, even if the paper doesn't ask it itself.

I don't think this should reflect negatively on the paper or on the law firms involved, it's just an interesting point that we've reported on previously.

@1.2 - Who is Dent? :)
Reply Report to LI
1.4.1
Show?
Like +1 Object -0 8 16 Jun 14, 11:52
Did you get permission from Netflix to use the picture?
Reply Report to LI
1.4.1.1
Show?
Like +2 Object -2 kianganz 16 Jun 14, 11:57
Nope - you want to tell their legal team about it? :)

I think it falls within fair use, and in any case, practically it's not something I'd think they'd chase, seeing as it's good publicity for their property...
Reply Report to LI
1.4.2
Show?
Like +2 Object -2 8 16 Jun 14, 13:54
Words matter. Just as most lawyers will not be ok to be call 'dalals' although many a time they do the same work done by agents.
Reply Report to LI
2
Like +5 Object -0 Scooter-S 16 Jun 14, 15:34  interesting
You don't the piss the Kian.
Reply Report to LI
3
Show?
Like +0 Object -0 Guess 18 Jun 14, 20:12
Hey Kian not one article on whether Modi and Jaitley will allow foreign law firms. Also no comment from SILF (chamchas of Congress and Chidambaram).
Reply Report to LI

refreshSort chronologically Filter out low-rated comments. Show all comments.