Editing Talk:Mooting Premier League 2011-12 moot court competitions

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 35: Line 35:
 
DMH witnessed participation from NYU, Columbia, Howard and 9 other international teams. Further the hospitality, standard of judging, extensive rounds & transparency has been appreciated. The moot should definitely be a tier 2 moot.
 
DMH witnessed participation from NYU, Columbia, Howard and 9 other international teams. Further the hospitality, standard of judging, extensive rounds & transparency has been appreciated. The moot should definitely be a tier 2 moot.
  
As a participant, DMH was a wonderful experience. The level of competition and hospitality is un- paralleled. - Chandni
+
As a participant, DMH was a wonderful experience. The level of competition and hospitality is un- parallel. - Chandni
  
 
==Raj Anand Moot==
 
==Raj Anand Moot==

Please note that all contributions to Legallypedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Legallypedia:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)