Difference between revisions of "Talk:Mooting Premier League 2010-11 moot court competitions"

From Legallypedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (FDI moot selection rounds- upgrade?)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Any thoughts? --[[User:Kianganz|Kianganz]] 20:24, 1 October 2010 (IST)
 
Any thoughts? --[[User:Kianganz|Kianganz]] 20:24, 1 October 2010 (IST)
 +
 +
Reason to Include LawAsia International Moot Court Competition in Tier-5(International Moots) of Mooting Premier League:
 +
 +
This year, 3 Indian Teams (NLSUI Bangalore, NLU Delhi and IIT Kharagpur IPR) have participated in the moot, which is equal to the no. of Indian teams participating in most of the other International moots in this tier. It would be highly unfair to the teams who participate and win if this moot is not included. If the standard for inclusion is the repute of the moot and amount of Indian participation, this moot is at par with all the rest of the moots in the tier. For the MPL to be fair and un-biased to all colleges this moot should be included in the list.

Revision as of 23:03, 13 November 2010

Any thoughts? --Kianganz 20:24, 1 October 2010 (IST)

Reason to Include LawAsia International Moot Court Competition in Tier-5(International Moots) of Mooting Premier League:

This year, 3 Indian Teams (NLSUI Bangalore, NLU Delhi and IIT Kharagpur IPR) have participated in the moot, which is equal to the no. of Indian teams participating in most of the other International moots in this tier. It would be highly unfair to the teams who participate and win if this moot is not included. If the standard for inclusion is the repute of the moot and amount of Indian participation, this moot is at par with all the rest of the moots in the tier. For the MPL to be fair and un-biased to all colleges this moot should be included in the list.