Its weird how your whole attitude towards life changes when you jst step into a law school, before your 1st day at a law school things are either right or wrong and there are only two planes, when you finish few days or till the first moot court to be specific you come to know it is utter foolishness to consider something right or wrong on prima facie, and it is rather interesting to know that this not only affects your life as a future lawyer but also your personal life is higly influenced by it, and with the capability of finding the third aspect in an argument where the debate is whether glass is half filled or half empty could prove to be insane to others but is very satisfying to yourself.
     The Pure distinction of this principle can be be realised only when you understand the fact that in a given episode no one is right or wrong its just some people are different in their regular buisness but its are perception which enragingly pushes us to look at it in a given angle. Well i must admit that this idea of different only struck me not when i was looking through law journals or a draft but when i read a certain section of a novel written on lord shiva by a debutant writer, not only the whole plot of the book was intriguing but this very fact rung a serious bell, louder than the one which we anticipated the lunch break bell to be.
  Although it wouldn't be right to say that nothing is wrong or right things are right and wrong but then i sure do stand by the fact the perception is deciding factor in taking this radical decision..