Experts & Views
Hello ,
I am an medical aspirant ( MBBS )
The main point of my letter is in the question that to have a NEET or not
The NEET Pattern would obviously curb malpractices , financial burden , stress , etc
But the recent order by Honourable Supreme Court of India has came as a blunder to the students.
The order should have been passed or implemented after or before 6months of the exam .
Almost many students have paid Thousands of rupees for varied exam, half of the exams have been completed
There have many discussions going in round in students related to issue many of them are just unable to digest it .
SC should be deciding on the matter with Center or MCI but also students should be taken into consideration since they are the major stakeholders
There have many solutions doubts suggestion rounding off in students circle like wise.
1.If SC wants to go on with its firmness then it should keep 24 July as the ultimate common exam because it would be unfair to many students who have done with NEET 1
2. Implement NEET from 2017 and go on with current year exams
Every students have their planned their studies in response to the exam schedule
And saying two days before that AIPMT is the ultimate one is unfair because not everyone take it seriously
We seems to have loosened our grip on AIIMS CMC ,etc
Just two days before saying now AIPMT would account for 52000 seats rather than 3000 which was considered is unfair
Our situation is like a prey of a spider who is now trapped in the web
So SC came as a survivor but rather than helping it too got harmful to us
I would like to get the views forwards or been provided complex yet beneficial suggestion to all students .
Thanking You ,
Vinay Yadav
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first
it would be injustice to hold two exam for one common test for two sets of people why should the othervlot get a three month grace time
and to resolve the problem of states the paper should also be ib their vernacular languages also.
and the thing that states are not getting enough time and syllabus are different. Then we all would agree that three months are more than enough for its prep. And It is not that the students preparing for neet has studied different things about some system of human and the state boards have studied about the rat or mouse instead of human.
the only thing is to understand the pattern and get practiced to it becoz matter is the same, and for this i think three months is enough.
and all have definitely studied 11th and 12thand the syllabus is changed.
so a common and fair exam should be conducted on 24 july for all the candidates. So that injustice is not done to the 1st phase students because two phase exam means
1. Less time given to phase one students
2.more time i.e. Almost three months given to other student
3.two different test taken by two different lot of students.
4.two test would not have equal standards, i.e. One would definitely be tougher than the other so why this injustice to one lot and an upliftment regardless to merit for the other lot
1) Earlier students were in a dilemma about their fate wrt NEET vs State vs Pvt due to sudden decision on 28.04.16. But now students are more or less reconciled with their fate.
2) Students may not be considering AIPMT the best option because of other options available. But now NEET seems to be the only major option.
3) Students given chance to appear in NEET -2 have additional time period for studying approx 2.5 months . This is additional since in may cases they already know the subject because of their probable exams in other pvt & state colleges.
4) Questins will be different in NEET 1 vs NEET 2. Hence a disparity in evaluation /assessment too.
4) MOREOVER WHAT IS THE HARM IN BRINGING ALL THE STUDENTS IN 01 PLATFORM BY ALLOWING FOR NEET-2 ?
Please consider as it is guided more by administrative reasons of holding the exams in larger scale rather than sentiments of students
2- moreover ridiculuos decisions of supreme court that neet will b in 2 phases & 2nd phase exam for those students who haven't filled up the form for aipmt. it clearly shows that these students donot find themselves capable for all india medical exam (who donot even respect aipmt ). SC is ready to give such students a golden oppurtunity & a 3 months bonus time for preparation.
3- what about those sincere students who responsibly filled up aipmt ?
4- now SC is ready to give a second chance to students who left neet phase-1 or didn't attended it or left outside their exam centres as they were late, is this right ?
are those students "idiots" who sincerely came on 1st may even they were not physically well or they were having any medical ailment just to give their exam ?
5- whats the point of neet now when students filled up various forms. half of the universities have taken their respective exams. it doesn't benefited students in point of view of money or manpower.
GIVING SECOND CHANCE AGAIN & AGAIN TO THOSE WHO DONOT DESERVE THEM. IS IT CORRECT ???
threads most popular
thread most upvoted
comment newest
first oldest
first