•  •  Dark Mode

Your Interests & Preferences

I am a...

law firm lawyer
in-house company lawyer
litigation lawyer
law student
aspiring student
other

Website Look & Feel

 •  •  Dark Mode
Blog Layout

Save preferences

The Pendency Project: Pendency marches on but SC judges continue to crack older caseload in October

Overall pendency marches but a slight but pleasant trend visible in the older cases
Overall pendency marches but a slight but pleasant trend visible in the older cases

The Supreme Court saw the backlog of cases increase by another 80 in a slow holiday-ridden October where almost 3,000 fewer cases were filed than in the previous month. However, in more positive news the apex court has managed to continue its now four-month record of getting cases older than one year off its books.

Since the end of May 2011, when arrears cases older than one year had increased to 36,926 (a grand 1,000+ more than a month earlier at April-end), the court has made steady progress month-by-month. In October almost 300 cases over a year old were cleared continuing the now four-month-long downward trend, although the SC has still not caught up with the figure it had in April 2011.

October also saw the greatest admin clean-up so far: 728 “disposed of matters pertaining to previous months, but updated this month” were taken on record. Last month this figure was a record 586, indicating either previous inefficiencies in records coupled with an administrative streamlining or simply a huge clearance rate in previous months that is only now getting picked up.

October was also the slowest month in the apex court this year since May, no doubt helped by Diwali and other holidays (see graph below).

Any light that can be shed by readers on the progeny of such late updated cases would be welcome.

In terms of new filings October was a very quiet month with numerous court holidays
In terms of new filings October was a very quiet month with numerous court holidays

Click to show 2 comments
at your own risk
(alt+c)
By reading the comments you agree that they are the (often anonymous) personal views and opinions of readers, which may be biased and unreliable, and for which Legally India therefore has no liability. If you believe a comment is inappropriate, please click 'Report to LI' below the comment and we will review it as soon as practicable.